Within IR Glare
How Ordinary Aircraft Became Infrared Dots
AARO matched several tiny infrared targets to conventional aircraft, showing that dot-like images need not reflect dot-shaped objects.
On this page
- What the western US recordings showed
- How flight data helped identify the targets
- Why unresolved dots are weak shape evidence
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
A 2021 infrared sighting over a military range in the western United States provides an unusually clear example of why a dot in thermal imagery should not be treated as evidence for a dot-shaped aircraft. Military personnel reported apparently equidistant lights moving at a steady pace and considered them a possible restricted-airspace incursion. The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) later concluded that the targets were almost certainly ordinary commercial aircraft, some as far as 300 nautical miles — about 556 kilometres — from the observing platform.[AARO]aaro.milCase Resolution of Western United States Uap 508 02262024UNCLASSIFIEDFebruary 11, 2026…
The importance of the case lies less in identifying another set of UAP than in showing how identification was achieved. The infrared pictures alone preserved little recognisable aircraft structure. AARO instead combined viewing geometry with air-traffic information and other data, finding that known aircraft occupied the relevant directions. It also attributed apparent changes in the dots’ shapes to sensor vibration and autofocus.[The Black Vault]documents2.theblackvault.comThe Black Vault
What the western US recordings showed
The incident occurred in western US military airspace in 2021. According to AARO’s case-resolution report, personnel initially reported five equidistant lights, described as “oblong dots/lights”, travelling at a relatively constant pace. Because they appeared potentially to be entering restricted airspace, the observation was reported as UAP.[The Black Vault]documents2.theblackvault.comThe Black Vault
That description is significant. Nothing about an “oblong dot” naturally suggests a conventional passenger aircraft with a long fuselage, swept wings and a tail. Yet AARO ultimately assessed that the objects were almost certainly commercial aircraft travelling along established air corridors. Its report says specific aircraft on different routes correlated strongly with the observations, at distances reaching roughly 300 nautical miles from the infrared sensor.[AARO]aaro.milCase Resolution of Western United States Uap 508 02262024UNCLASSIFIEDFebruary 11, 2026…
The publicly released footage makes the resolution problem particularly easy to appreciate. When AARO director Sean Kirkpatrick presented material from the case at NASA’s public UAP meeting on 31 May 2023, the Department of Defense described the objects visible in that footage as three commercial aircraft at great distance. According to the accompanying DoD explanation, radar tracks for commercial aircraft aligned with those objects, which appeared only as small dots because they were so far from the infrared sensor.[U.S. Department of War]defense.govU.S. Department of War MultimediaU.S. Department of WarMultimediaMay 31, 2023…(https://www.defense.gov/Multimedia/videoid/885190/)
There is a small but potentially confusing difference between the two official descriptions: AARO’s fuller case report discusses five reported lights, whereas the released video description refers to three objects shown in the footage. The documents therefore should not be read as saying that the original report consisted solely of the three dots displayed in the public clip. What matters for this narrower question is that both releases identify distant commercial aircraft as the source of the infrared targets.[The Black Vault]documents2.theblackvault.comThe Black Vault
The observers’ original distance judgement was also important. AARO says that analysis of the targets’ positions, together with additional information obtained during the investigation, showed that they were significantly farther away than the observers had initially estimated. That changes what an analyst should expect an infrared image to reveal: an aircraft hundreds of nautical miles away cannot be interpreted morphologically in the same way as an aircraft at close range.[The Black Vault]documents2.theblackvault.comThe Black Vault
How flight data identified the targets
AARO did not resolve the case by deciding that the dots merely “looked like planes”. In fact, their appearance was too poorly resolved for that to be a strong method of identification. The investigation instead treated the image as one piece of a larger geometrical and traffic-data problem.
First, analysis of air-traffic-control information indicated that commercial aircraft were travelling along established flight corridors between major airports in the region. AARO reported a strong correlation between the UAP directions and specific commercial aircraft travelling on different routes.[The Black Vault]documents2.theblackvault.comThe Black Vault
Second, AARO’s Science and Technology partners conducted an independent assessment. The report says they used boresight analysis — analysis of the direction in which the sensor was pointing — and independently reached the commercial-aircraft conclusion. The reconstructed targets were at roughly 20,000–40,000 feet and at comparable long ranges.[AARO]aaro.milCase Resolution of Western United States Uap 508 02262024UNCLASSIFIEDFebruary 11, 2026…
That combination is much stronger than silhouette matching. If the sensor’s pointing direction at a given moment intersects the expected position of a known aircraft, and this correspondence continues appropriately as the sensor and aircraft move, the traffic track supplies information that the tiny infrared image cannot. A featureless blob can therefore become identifiable without ever resolving into a recognisable aeroplane.
This approach has broader technical support outside this particular AARO investigation. The Galileo Project’s development of an all-sky infrared aerial-observation system, for example, uses aircraft positions from Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast (ADS-B) data to calibrate its infrared cameras and has reconstructed hundreds of thousands of aerial-object trajectories. Its researchers emphasise that ambiguous imagery often requires distance, kinematic information or additional sensor modalities before an object can be classified reliably.[arXiv]arxiv.orgCommissioning An All-Sky Infrared Camera Array for Detection Of Airborne ObjectsNovember 12, 2024…
The western US case is a practical demonstration of the same principle: external positional information can preserve identity after image detail has been lost.
Why the dots did not preserve aircraft shape
The resolution becomes especially revealing when AARO’s conclusion is compared with what the infrared display seemed to show. The case report explicitly classified the observed shape as “oblong dots/lights”, despite identifying the underlying targets as aircraft.[The Black Vault]documents2.theblackvault.comThe Black Vault
AARO also found that some apparent changes in those shapes were not changes in the physical targets at all. Its intelligence assessment attributed the apparent shape variations to sensor vibration and autofocus, and the report illustrates what it calls Western US UAP “shape distortion due to sensor vibration”.[AARO]aaro.milCase Resolution of Western United States Uap 508 02262024UNCLASSIFIEDFebruary 11, 2026…
This matters because shape interpretation can quietly reverse the direction of inference. A viewer may reason:
The infrared target has no visible wings or tail, so it cannot be an aeroplane.
The western US resolution demonstrates why that inference is unsafe. Once an aircraft is sufficiently distant, the relevant question is no longer whether the display resembles the aircraft’s physical outline. It is whether the imaging system has enough angular resolution to preserve that outline at all.
At 300 nautical miles, even a large airliner subtends a very small angle. Its fuselage, wings, engines and tail may occupy too few useful image-resolution elements to remain separately recognisable. What survives can instead be a compact infrared contrast source whose displayed boundary is influenced by the sensor’s optics, focus, motion and image processing. In AARO’s own public description of this case, the result was simply “small dots” despite the underlying objects being commercial aircraft.[U.S. Department of War]defense.govU.S. Department of War MultimediaU.S. Department of WarMultimediaMay 31, 2023…(https://www.defense.gov/Multimedia/videoid/885190/)
The case therefore gives concrete evidence for the distinction between detecting a target and resolving its shape. The sensor successfully detected the aircraft. It did not necessarily produce a miniature thermal photograph in which every aeronautical feature survived.
Why unresolved dots are weak shape evidence
The strongest lesson from the western US case is not that every infrared dot is an aeroplane. It is that an unresolved infrared dot carries surprisingly little information about the object’s actual geometry.
A compact target can still contain useful information about position, angular motion, brightness and changes over time. Those measurements can be valuable. But describing the displayed patch as an “orb”, “oval” or “featureless craft” risks treating an imaging product as though it were a resolved physical silhouette.
The AARO case gives three reasons for caution at once. The objects were much farther away than initially estimated; independent geometrical analysis associated them with ordinary aircraft; and apparent variations in their displayed shapes were attributed to vibration and autofocus rather than to changes in the aircraft themselves.[The Black Vault]documents2.theblackvault.comThe Black Vault
It also shows why unresolved cases should remain genuinely unresolved rather than acquiring stronger shape claims by default. Failure to identify a dot does not establish that its physical object was spherical, wingless or structurally unusual. It may simply mean that the information needed to distinguish a fuselage from wings and tail never survived into the recorded image.
That distinction is particularly important in UAP investigations because useful corroborating data are not always available. NASA’s independent UAP study highlighted poor or incomplete data as a central obstacle to rigorous analysis and recommended calibrated, multisensor observations capable of testing apparent anomalous properties rather than relying on isolated imagery.[WIRED]wired.comNASA Didn't Find Aliens-but if You See Any UFOs, HollerThe agency stressed the need to shift the conversation from sensationalism to science and eliminate the stigma associated with reporting… The western US case shows what can happen when such complementary information is available: an apparently mysterious infrared configuration can be traced back to ordinary traffic.
The useful takeaway from the aircraft dots
AARO’s western US investigation offers a rare controlled lesson because the final identification and the misleading appearance can be compared directly. The targets presented as small, sometimes oblong infrared lights. Yet air-traffic information, positional correlation and independent boresight analysis led AARO to conclude that they were commercial aircraft, potentially hundreds of nautical miles away.[AARO]aaro.milCase Resolution of Western United States Uap 508 02262024UNCLASSIFIEDFebruary 11, 2026…
That does not prove that every featureless infrared UAP is conventional aircraft, nor does it resolve unrelated cases in which comparable flight or sensor data are absent. It establishes a narrower and more defensible point: ordinary aircraft can become dots in infrared imagery, and those dots need not retain the aircraft’s true shape.
For interpreting UFO and UAP footage, that is consequential. The absence of visible wings, a tail or a recognisable fuselage is meaningful only if the sensor had enough effective resolution to show those features in the first place. Where the target is extremely distant and represented by only a tiny infrared signature, the displayed blob is evidence that something was detected — but, as the western US aircraft demonstrate, it can be very weak evidence for what that something was physically shaped like.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to How Ordinary Aircraft Became Infrared Dots. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Infrared Thermal Imaging: Fundamentals, Research and Applicat...
This richly illustrated hands-on guide is designed for researchers, teachers and practitioners. The huge selection of examples taken from...
Introduction to Infrared and Electro-Optical Systems
This newly revised and updated edition offers a current and complete introduction to the analysis and design of Electro-Optical (EO) imag...
Digital Image Processing
This is the eBook of the printed book and may not include any media, website access codes, or print supplements that may come packaged wi...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Current eBay listing
VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT
Current eBay listing
I Want To Believe UFO Poster Giclée Fine Art Heavyweight Print
Endnotes
1.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: Case Resolution of Western United States Uap 508 02262024
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/case_resolution_reports/Case_Resolution_of%20_Western_United_States_Uap_508-02262024.pdf
Source snippet
UNCLASSIFIEDFebruary 11, 2026...
Published: February 11, 2026
2.
Source: documents2.theblackvault.com
Title: The Black Vault
Link:https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/dod/Western_United_States_Case_Resolution.pdf
3.
Source: defense.gov
Title: U.S. Department of War Multimedia
Link:https://www.defense.gov/Multimedia/videoid/885190/
Source snippet
U.S. Department of WarMultimediaMay 31, 2023...
Published: May 31, 2023
4.
Source: defense.gov
Title: U.S. Department of War Videos
Link:https://www.defense.gov/Multimedia/Videos/videoid/885193/
5.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: UAP Imagery
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/4/
Source snippet
AARO UAP Imagery...
6.
Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07956
Source snippet
Commissioning An All-Sky Infrared Camera Array for Detection Of Airborne ObjectsNovember 12, 2024...
Published: November 12, 2024
7.
Source: wired.com
Title: NASA Didn’t Find Aliens-but if You See Any UFOs, Holler
Link:https://www.wired.com/story/nasa-ufos-aliens-report-2023
Source snippet
The agency stressed the need to shift the conversation from sensationalism to science and eliminate the stigma associated with reporting...
8.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-Imagery-Acc-Table/
Source snippet
AARO UAP Imagery Acc TableMay 8, 2026 — UAP IMAGERY DATATABLE FOR NEXT RELEASE UAP Imagery Imagery | Release Date | Release Number | Titl...
Published: May 8, 2026
9.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-UAP-Report-Documents/poster/dividLink/
10.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/uap/faqs/
11.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/uap/
12.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/
13.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/dvpmoduleid/77396/
14.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1014101/dvpcc/false/
15.
Source: asapdata.arc.nasa.gov
Title: wdts 2023 spring
Link:https://asapdata.arc.nasa.gov/sensors/master/data/deploy_html/wdts_2023_spring.html
16.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/988676/dvpcc/false/
17.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006110/dvpmoduleid/77396/
18.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006106/dvpcc/false/
19.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006110/dvpcc/false/
20.
Source: war.gov
Title: Videos | U.S. Department of War
Link:https://www.war.gov/Multimedia/Videos/videoid/885193/
21.
Source: war.gov
Title: Multimedia | U.S. Department of War
Link:https://www.war.gov/Multimedia/?dvpmoduleid=5963&videoid=885190
22.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: NAS A Provides Coverage of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Meeting
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-provides-coverage-of-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-meeting/
23.
Source: asapdata.arc.nasa.gov
Link:https://asapdata.arc.nasa.gov/picard/data/flt_html/23641.html
24.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: Small Steps, Giant Leaps: Episode 101: Artemis Missions
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/podcasts/small-steps-giant-leaps/small-steps-giant-leaps-episode-101-artemis-missions/
25.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1010272/dvpcc/false/
26.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1010276/dvpcc/false/
27.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006060/dvpcc/false/
28.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: rapid intensification for typhoon chanthu 148814
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/earth/earth-observatory/rapid-intensification-for-typhoon-chanthu-148814/
29.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: Gas Pipeline Inspections Simulated in Final NASA SIO Demonstration
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/aeronautics/gas-pipeline-inspections-simulated-in-final-nasa-sio-demonstration/
30.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006083/dvpcc/false/
31.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006089/dvpmoduleid/77396/
32.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: identifying ufos and uaps
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/skywatching/night-sky-network/identifying-ufos-and-uaps/
33.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: tropical cyclone haruna 80510
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/earth/earth-observatory/tropical-cyclone-haruna-80510/
34.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: typhoon lupit 40869
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/earth/earth-observatory/typhoon-lupit-40869/
35.
Source: eol.jsc.nasa.gov
Link:https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/searchphotos/photo.pl?frame=173&mission=STS109&roll=716
36.
Source: eol.jsc.nasa.gov
Link:https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/SearchPhotos/photo.pl?frame=15&mission=STS109&roll=708
37.
Source: eol.jsc.nasa.gov
Link:https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/SearchPhotos/photo.pl?frame=16&mission=STS109&roll=708
38.
Source: eol.jsc.nasa.gov
Link:https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/SearchPhotos/photo.pl?frame=39&mission=STS082&roll=716
39.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19810017609
40.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19770003164
41.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19750009474
42.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19730017624
43.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-UAP-Case-RR-Data-Table/
44.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Inactive-Parent/Next-UAP-Imagery-dup/
45.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/AARO-UAP-Case-Resolution-DT/
46.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-Imagery-Fixed-Table/
47.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/ftag/MSF0951a18/
48.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/AARO-UAP-Case-DT/
49.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: AAR O UAP Trends All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office UAP REPORTING TRENDS
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/UAP-Reporting-Trends/
50.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-Trends/
51.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/
52.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: UAP Imagery Western United States Case Resolution. Atmospheric Wake
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/
53.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: Congressional Press Products
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Congressional-Press-Products/
54.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: Congressional Tab DT
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/AARO-Congressional-Tab-DT/
55.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Inactive-Parent/Next-Congressional-Press-Products/
56.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: EFOIA Reading Room
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/EFOIA-Reading-Room/
57.
Source: impact.earthdata.nasa.gov
Link:https://impact.earthdata.nasa.gov/casei/platform/PA-32/
58.
Source: akama.arc.nasa.gov
Title: Query Wizard Filter.aspx
Link:https://akama.arc.nasa.gov/ASRSDBOnline/QueryWizard_Filter.aspx
59.
Source: nasa.gov
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/history/rogersrep/v3appoe2.htm
60.
Source: ssd-api.jpl.nasa.gov
Link:https://ssd-api.jpl.nasa.gov/doc/fireball.html
61.
Source: ssd-api.jpl.nasa.gov
Title: sb ident
Link:https://ssd-api.jpl.nasa.gov/doc/sb_ident.html
62.
Source: impact.earthdata.nasa.gov
Link:https://impact.earthdata.nasa.gov/casei/platform/J-31/
63.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19980230606
64.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: aaro releases 3 case resolution reports identifying uap ufo cases
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/aaro-releases-3-case-resolution-reports-identifying-uap-ufo-cases/
65.
Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/776702156/Case-Resolution-of-Western-United-States-Uap-508-02262024
66.
Source: t.co
Link:https://t.co/4M3L5Trglk
67.
Source: theprojectbluebookarchive.org
Title: All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office
Link:https://theprojectbluebookarchive.org/archive/modern/sod/493468580/020_Western_US.pdf
Additional References
68.
Source: ufotransparency.com
Link:https://ufotransparency.com/files/2024-02-26-aaro-western-united-states-uap-case-resolution-aaro-western-us-case-resolution
69.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlpUA5LbUf4
Source snippet
This collection of YouTube videos directly illustrates how infrared sensor artifacts, long-distance observation, and flight data correlat...
70.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Just Released MILITARY VIDEO of THREE UAP’s in the Western U.S
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2XR__9m7Vc
Source snippet
Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Captured By Military Drone...
71.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Captured By Military Drone
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sl3LSYJm4_0
Source snippet
DECLASSIFIED VIDEO: UFO FILES - South Asian Object 2...
72.
Source: youtube.com
Title: DECLASSIFIED VIDEO: UFO FILES
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdJvR5MmEAM
Source snippet
AARO's Most Compelling UAP Case | The Western U.S. Deck...
73.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/17b5bo7/we_here_at_aaro_want_you_to_believe_that_these_3/
74.
Source: uap-sweden.vercel.app
Link:https://uap-sweden.vercel.app/dokument/aaro-brief-at-annual-transportation-research-board-january
75.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/18908x1/aaro_prosaic_explanations_are_getting_outrageous/
76.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/167nwhe/aaros_videos_the_us_government_cannot_identify/
77.
Source: ameblo.jp
Link:https://ameblo.jp/kz0222/entry-12831182275.html