Within Fireworks
Conisholme Firework
The strange lights reported around the Conisholme wind-turbine incident in Lincolnshire in January 2009 had a strikingly ordinary possible source: a private firework display held roughly two miles from the wind farm for an 80th birthday.
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
That distinction is the enduring value of the case. Fireworks provided a plausible explanation for at least some of the unusual lights without needing to explain the broken turbine. Subsequent investigation of the turbine pointed instead towards mechanical failure and explicitly eliminated collision. Conisholme therefore illustrates a common trap in unusual-aerial-phenomena reports: two unusual things happening close together in time can look like one event even when they have different causes.[The Guardian]theguardian.comThe GuardianAlien mystery in outer limits of Lincolnshire finally solved | UK news | The GuardianFebruary 10, 2009…
What witnesses reported near the damaged wind turbine
The incident centred on Fen Farm wind park at Conisholme, a 16 MW installation comprising 20 Enercon E48 turbines. One turbine suffered dramatic rotor damage during the night of 3–4 January 2009: one roughly 20-metre blade detached and another was badly damaged. The detached blade was recovered on the ground, despite early reporting that helped create the impression that it had mysteriously disappeared.
Reports of lights gave the mechanical accident a much more unusual character. Contemporary accounts were not uniform descriptions of one clearly observed object. John Harrison, a farmer at Saltfleetby, described an enormous luminous phenomenon that reminded him of an octopus because of its apparent extensions. Dorothy Willows, observing from Louth, interpreted strange lights as suggesting a low-flying object moving towards the turbines. Another prominent witness, local councillor Robert Palmer, described a round white light with a reddish or orange edge that seemed to hover over the wind-farm area.[The Guardian]theguardian.comThe Guardian UFO puzzle: it was the Guardian wot done it | UK news | The GuardianThe GuardianUFO puzzle: it was the Guardian wot done it | UK news | The GuardianJanuary 8, 2009
Later compilations added reports of orange spheres and a stationary yellow light, but these accounts require caution. A National UFO Reporting Center entry, for example, collected several such descriptions second-hand and explicitly stated that its submitter had not witnessed the event. It also gives an occurrence date inconsistent with the well-established 3–4 January chronology. It is therefore useful as a record of how the story circulated, rather than as an independent primary witness account.[NUFORC]nuforc.orgNUFORC UFO Sighting 67919.January 10, 2009…
The timing nevertheless made the reports compelling. Residents had seen unusual lights; a loud crash was reported during the same broad overnight period; and a large piece of machinery was subsequently found visibly wrecked. Reporting quickly fused those facts into a possible collision narrative. The front-page treatment went further still, presenting the episode as a UFO striking a wind turbine before the physical investigation had established why the rotor had failed.[The Guardian]theguardian.comThe Guardian UFO puzzle: it was the Guardian wot done it | UK news | The GuardianThe GuardianUFO puzzle: it was the Guardian wot done it | UK news | The GuardianJanuary 8, 2009
Yet no source identified in the contemporary record establishes that somebody actually watched a luminous object collide with the turbine. That evidential gap is crucial. There were reports of lights and there was turbine damage, but temporal proximity alone did not establish a physical connection between them. Indeed, an industry expert interviewed at the time noted that blade separations, although unusual, were known mechanical failures and that mechanical failure was considerably more familiar than collisions with aircraft or unidentified objects.[The Independent]the-independent.comOpen source on the-independent.com.
The nearby birthday fireworks and the unusual lights
The most concrete mundane explanation for the lights emerged almost immediately. Emily Bell, then the Guardian’s director of digital content, had been staying with her family nearby. Late on the Saturday night, she and her brother had arranged a substantial firework display in their parents’ garden for their father Peter’s 80th birthday. The location was reported as only about two miles from the Ecotricity wind farm.[The Guardian]theguardian.comThe Guardian UFO puzzle: it was the Guardian wot done it | UK news | The GuardianThe GuardianUFO puzzle: it was the Guardian wot done it | UK news | The GuardianJanuary 8, 2009
That coincidence was unusually specific. It was not a general suggestion that somebody somewhere in Lincolnshire might have been setting off fireworks. Investigators had an identified display, an identified occasion, a nearby location and the relevant night. Contemporary reporting had already noted that the unusual lights might have resulted from birthday fireworks before the fuller account of the Bell family’s display appeared.[The Guardian]theguardian.comOpen source on theguardian.com.
The description of the display also fits important parts of the reported visual phenomenon. Bell recalled that her brother had bought particularly large fireworks, producing orange and blue effects. From a distance of around two miles, observers elsewhere in the flat Lincolnshire landscape would not necessarily have had the perspective of guests standing beside the launch site. They could see luminous effects in the sky without sharing the contextual clues that immediately identified them to the partygoers as pyrotechnics.[The Guardian]theguardian.comThe Guardian UFO puzzle: it was the Guardian wot done it | UK news | The GuardianThe GuardianUFO puzzle: it was the Guardian wot done it | UK news | The GuardianJanuary 8, 2009
That makes the fireworks particularly relevant to the more colourful reports. Bright points, expanding components and descending burning material can look quite different when viewed obliquely and at distance than they do from the intended viewing position. A witness seeing only part of the display could reasonably describe luminous spheres or elongated, tentacle-like features without having observed anything structurally resembling a flying craft.
The fireworks explanation nevertheless has limits. The witness reports varied in appearance, apparent movement and duration, and there is insufficient surviving evidence to demonstrate that every reported light was one of the birthday fireworks. Dale Vince of Ecotricity later remained unconvinced that fireworks accounted for all the flashing or apparently persistent lights described by witnesses.[The Guardian]theguardian.comThe GuardianAlien mystery in outer limits of Lincolnshire finally solved | UK news | The GuardianFebruary 10, 2009…
That reservation does not restore the collision hypothesis. It simply leaves open the possibility that the collection of “Conisholme lights” contained more than one observation or source. Witnesses at different places and times need not have been looking at the same thing. For assessing UFO reports, that is an important distinction: finding a strong conventional candidate for some observations does not require forcing every testimony into an identical explanation.
Why explaining the lights did not explain the turbine failure
The strongest reason to separate the lights from the damage came from the turbine itself. In January, East Lindsey District Council recorded that the Health and Safety Executive was the enforcing authority and that the operator’s preliminary findings still required detailed analysis. Turbines of the affected E48 type were stopped and inspected by factory-trained personnel, while damaged components were examined and the hub was due to be dismantled. This was therefore a physical engineering investigation, not an attempt to infer the cause from eyewitness reports of the sky.[Democracy]democracy.e-lindsey.gov.ukOpen source on e-lindsey.gov.uk.
By February, manufacturer Enercon’s preliminary findings pointed to the blade’s bolted connection. The bolts securing the blade to the hub showed characteristic signs of fatigue failure. Reporting on the investigation said adjacent components appeared to have imposed stresses beyond the bolts’ design limits. Most importantly for the UFO claim, collision had been eliminated.[The Guardian]theguardian.comThe GuardianAlien mystery in outer limits of Lincolnshire finally solved | UK news | The GuardianFebruary 10, 2009…
Technical literature discussing wind-turbine structural failures has subsequently used Conisholme as an example of blade failure, describing the blade as coming loose after its hub-attachment bolts failed and citing Enercon’s interim conclusion of material fatigue. That places the accident within an established engineering failure category rather than requiring an external airborne impact.[Aalborg Universitets forskningsportal]vbn.aau.dkAalborg Universitets forskningsportal Aalborg UniversitetAalborg Universitets forskningsportal Aalborg Universitet
This also resolves an apparent contradiction in the early coverage. Immediately after the accident, the damage genuinely was unexplained, so possibilities including collision, lightning, material failure, design failure and maintenance problems were discussed. The unusual lights consequently seemed potentially significant. But “cause not yet established” was only the state of the investigation at that moment; it was not positive evidence that something had struck the turbine.[Wind Power Monthly]windpowermonthly.comWind Power Monthly Media UFO frenzy over damaged turbine | Windpower MonthlyWind Power Monthly Media UFO frenzy over damaged turbine | Windpower Monthly
Once the mechanical evidence emerged, the logical structure of the case changed. There was no longer a need for the aerial lights to supply enough energy to tear off a blade or deform another. Whatever produced the lights could be investigated as a separate observation. The birthday fireworks could therefore explain lights while doing nothing whatsoever to the turbine.
Why Conisholme became such a convincing UFO story
Conisholme is memorable because the coincidence was unusually persuasive before its components were separated. An unexplained light by itself is commonplace. A broken machine by itself invites an engineering investigation. Put strange lights, a loud nocturnal crash and spectacular rotor damage into the same few hours, however, and a causal story almost writes itself.
Early information amplified that effect. Reports that the detached blade had “disappeared” made the accident seem stranger than it was; the blade was actually found on the ground nearby. The operator was initially unable to give a cause, while speculation ranged from ice and meteorites to aircraft and UFOs. The visual drama of the damaged rotor then supplied a powerful physical anchor for otherwise ambiguous eyewitness reports.[NS Energy Business]nsenergybusiness.comNS Energy Business UFOs 'target UK windfarmNS Energy BusinessUFOs 'target UK windfarm' - NS Energy…
The sequence is revealing:
- Unusual lights were reported in the area during the relevant night.
- A turbine suffered severe damage, apparently without an immediately obvious cause.
- The two observations were joined into one narrative, producing the idea that an unidentified object had struck the rotor.
- A nearby firework display was identified, providing a concrete conventional candidate for at least some of the lights.
- Engineering examination found a mechanical failure mechanism and eliminated collision, breaking the assumed causal link between the lights and the damaged turbine. The Guardian
The case therefore should not be simplified to “the Conisholme UFO was definitely fireworks”. That overstates what the surviving evidence establishes. A more precise conclusion is that there was a documented firework display only about two miles away on the same night, making fireworks a strong candidate for some of the reported luminous phenomena, while later examination independently attributed the turbine failure to its mechanical components rather than a collision.
The lasting lesson from Conisholme
For investigations of unusual aerial lights, Conisholme demonstrates why coincidence must be tested before it is treated as causation. The most visually memorable part of a report may not have produced the most physically dramatic event occurring nearby. A light in the sky and a damaged object on the ground can belong to separate causal chains even when witnesses encounter them during the same night.
Fireworks are especially capable of complicating such cases because observers who do not know that a display is taking place lack the information available to people at the firing site. At Conisholme, investigators had the unusually useful advantage of discovering a specific nearby display associated with a specific family celebration. That transformed “perhaps they were fireworks” from a generic debunking suggestion into a geographically and temporally grounded hypothesis. The Guardian
At the same time, the turbine investigation demonstrates why physical evidence should be analysed independently of eyewitness interpretation. The damaged machine could be dismantled and its components inspected. Those components provided evidence of stresses and bolt failure, while the investigation eliminated collision. The reported lights, by contrast, consisted largely of varied eyewitness descriptions whose relationship to one another could not be reconstructed with comparable certainty. The Guardian
The most defensible reading of the Conisholme episode is therefore not that one mundane explanation solved every detail. It is that the apparent single mystery came apart under investigation. Nearby birthday fireworks supplied a credible source for unusual lights; mechanical evidence supplied a separate explanation for the turbine damage. The episode became famous because those events happened close enough together to look connected. Its real value for understanding UFO and UAP reports lies in showing why investigators should first ask whether apparently connected observations actually require the same cause.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Conisholme Firework. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Handbook
An explanation of the usual reasons for confusing IFOs (identified flying objects) with UFOs and a survey of the tools used to investigat...
The Science of Sound
Written for students without a background in mathematics or physics, this textbook provides an introduction to the study of acoustics. It...
Fireworks
First published 1988. Subjects: Fireworks, Poudres (pyrotechnie), Feux d'artifice, Pyrotechnie.
UFOs Explained
Analyzing several UFO cases, the author exposes the myth of extraterrestrial visitors to earth.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Current eBay listing
VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT
Current eBay listing
I Want To Believe UFO Poster Giclée Fine Art Heavyweight Print
Endnotes
1.
Source: nuforc.org
Link:https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=67919
Source snippet
NUFORC UFO Sighting 67919.January 10, 2009...
Published: January 10, 2009
2.
Source: the-independent.com
Link:https://www.the-independent.com/news/uk/home-news/mechanical-failure-theory-in-ufo-mystery-1232483.html
3.
Source: nuforc.org
Link:https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=187999
5.
Source: theguardian.com
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/jan/08/wind-turbine-ufo-lincolnshire-the-sun
6.
Source: theguardian.com
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2009/feb/11/wind-turbine-mystery
Source snippet
The GuardianAlien mystery in outer limits of Lincolnshire finally solved | UK news | The GuardianFebruary 10, 2009...
Published: February 10, 2009
7.
Source: democracy.e-lindsey.gov.uk
Link:https://democracy.e-lindsey.gov.uk/documents/g3306/Public%20minutes%2021st-Jan-2009%2018.30%20Council.pdf?T=11
8.
Source: nsenergybusiness.com
Title: NS Energy Business UFOs ‘target UK windfarm’
Link:https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/news/newsufos-target-uk-windfarm/
Source snippet
NS Energy BusinessUFOs 'target UK windfarm' - NS Energy...
9.
Source: windpowermonthly.com
Title: Wind Power Monthly Media UFO frenzy over damaged turbine | Windpower Monthly
Link:https://www.windpowermonthly.com/article/957915/media-ufo-frenzy-damaged-turbine
10.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: The Guardian Open door | Siobhain Butterworth | The Guardian
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/jan/12/language-barriers
11.
Source: vbn.aau.dk
Title: Aalborg Universitets forskningsportal Aalborg Universitet
Link:https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/217259413/Chapter_145_Fatigue_Life_of_Wind_Turbine_Blades.pdf
12.
Source: resources.hse.gov.uk
Title: hse.gov.uk Notices served
Link:https://resources.hse.gov.uk/notices/notices/notice_details.asp?SF=CN&SV=313092852
13.
Source: resources.hse.gov.uk
Title: hse.gov.uk Notices found
Link:https://resources.hse.gov.uk/notices/notices/notice_list.asp?PN=1638&SO=DNIS&ST=N
14.
Source: resources.hse.gov.uk
Title: hse.gov.uk Breaches found
Link:https://resources.hse.gov.uk/notices/breach/breach_list.asp?EO=&PN=2806&SN=F&SO=ANBID&ST=B
15.
Source: resources.hse.gov.uk
Title: hse.gov.uk Breaches found
Link:https://resources.hse.gov.uk/notices/breach/breach_list.asp?EO=&PN=2805&SN=F&SO=ANBID&ST=B
16.
Source: find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk
Title: company-information.service.gov.uk Charge
Link:https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05416570/charges/lQz2y0t7TZGx8Xf21kZqgRuz8So
17.
Source: GOV.UK
Title: health and safety executive annual report and accounts 2009 to 2010
Link:https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-and-safety-executive-annual-report-and-accounts-2009-to-2010
18.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: Nighttime events around the UK | Family | The Guardian
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2009/nov/01/nighttime-events-uk-2009
19.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: Crane collapses on block of flats | UK news | The Guardian
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2009/jul/06/crane-collapses-liverpool-flats
20.
Source: GOV.UK
Title: health and safety executive annual report and accounts 2008 to 2009
Link:https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-and-safety-executive-annual-report-and-accounts-2008-to-2009
21.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: Alien concept | Nick Pope | The Guardian
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/jan/09/wind-turbine-ufo-alien
22.
Source: theguardian.com
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/media/organgrinder/2009/jan/08/windpower-thesun
23.
Source: nsenergybusiness.com
Title: Ecotricity’s 290 Feet Wind Turbine Damaged With A UFO Hit In Lincolnshire
Link:https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/news/newsecotricitys_290_feet_wind_turbine_damaged_with_a_ufo_hit_in_lincolnshire_090108-2/
24.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: BB C ‘wasted £6m on gas turbines’ | BBC | The Guardian
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/media/2008/jul/18/bbc.television
25.
Source: flickr.com
Link:https://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/ecotricity/
26.
Source: press.hse.gov.uk
Link:https://press.hse.gov.uk/tag/health-and-safety-execuive/
27.
Source: find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk
Title: company-information.service.gov.uk Peter BELL personal appointments
Link:https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/AumIziDVWD5ypFRTEPBlK_k2ooI/appointments
28.
Source: find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk
Title: company-information.service.gov.uk Christopher Peter BELL personal appointments
Link:https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/O5Fgslj1KF7FIwl0EKesa7Gwrcw/appointments
29.
Source: find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk
Title: company-information.service.gov.uk CONISHOLM E FARMS LIMITED charges
Link:https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/00658925/charges
30.
Source: find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk
Title: company-information.service.gov.uk FE N FARM WIND PARK LIMITED charges
Link:https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/05416570/charges
31.
Source: aftermathnews.wordpress.com
Link:https://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/category/ufo-alien-psyops/page/2/
32.
Source: a.osmarks.net
Link:https://a.osmarks.net/content/wikipedia_en_all_maxi_2020-08/A/Conisholme
33.
Source: hseni.gov.uk
Title: WISHN I
Link:https://www.hseni.gov.uk/articles/wishni-history
Additional References
34.
Source: flickr.com
Title: 10th January Video of UFO destroyed wind turbine | Video and… | Flickr
Link:https://www.flickr.com/photos/bluecowboy2002/3187460398
Source snippet
10th January Video of UFO destroyed wind turbine | Video and… | Flickr...
35.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Lincolnshire UFO Hit’s Wind Turbine
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dFi3i_IIWc
Source snippet
UFO hits wind turbine Lincolnshire UFO England Destroys Wind Turbine in Lincolnshire UK 2009...
36.
Source: hauntedhosts.com
Link:https://hauntedhosts.com/haunted-places/lincolnshire/location/3765-conisholme-white-light-sighting/
37.
Source: wikimapia.org
Link:https://wikimapia.org/11282646/Conisholme-Wind-Farm
38.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0263822317338096
39.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263822322002781
40.
Source: manualzz.com
Link:https://manualzz.com/doc/26489762/thames-and-kosmos-dimension-board-game-user-manual
41.
Source: energymap.co.uk
Link:https://www.energymap.co.uk/project.asp?pageid=1974
42.
Source: commons.wikimedia.org
Link:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ATernary-structure-reveals-mechanism-of-a-membrane-diacylglycerol-kinase-ncomms10140-s2.ogv
43.
Source: oocities.org
Link:https://www.oocities.org/ilfufo/sightings.htm