Why Military Flares Can Resemble UFO Formations

Introduction

Military illumination flares can produce one of the more convincing kinds of UFO or UAP light display: several brilliant points apparently hovering in formation, drifting sideways, descending almost imperceptibly and then vanishing one after another. The effect is not accidental. Large illumination flares are designed to remain aloft under parachutes for minutes while casting intense light over terrain. A US Air Force manual, for example, describes the LUU-2 aircraft parachute flare as producing roughly two million candlepower for about five minutes while descending thousands of feet.[E-Publishing]static.e-publishing.af.milOpen source on af.mil.

That combination of long duration, slow descent and extreme brightness removes many of the visual cues people normally use to judge distance, scale and speed at night. Wind can carry separate flares together, while staggered release or burnout can make a row of lights seem to appear or extinguish deliberately. The strongest flare explanation, however, is not simply that a sighting “looks like flares”. It is one in which the sighting’s time, direction, behaviour and duration also match documented military activity.

How parachute flares can seem to hover

Illumination flares are fundamentally different from the brief defensive flares sometimes seen pouring from military aircraft. A US Federal Register notice describing training ordnance distinguishes short-lived self-protection flares, which burn for less than ten seconds, from LUU-2 high-intensity illumination flares. The latter are ejected from an aircraft, deploy a parachute after a timed delay and burn for approximately five minutes while suspended beneath it.[GovInfo]govinfo.govOpen source on govinfo.gov.

The Air Force’s MC-130J manual gives an unusually useful description of what that means in the sky. It specifies an LUU-2/B or 2A/B illumination time of approximately 300 seconds and recommends a release geometry in which the burning flare descends about 2,500 feet before burnout.[E-Publishing]static.e-publishing.af.milOpen source on af.mil. That is slow enough that, at a distance of many kilometres, the downward movement may occupy only a tiny angle in an observer’s field of view. Without a visible foreground reference, a steadily descending source can therefore look nearly stationary.

The parachute also makes the path less like a falling projectile and more like a drifting aerial light. Air Force safety guidance explicitly treats the flare’s rate of descent and drift as variables when determining safe release altitude and distance.[E-Publishing]static.e-publishing.af.milOpen source on af.mil. A flare can consequently move laterally with winds while sinking slowly, especially when different winds act at different heights.

Its brightness compounds the problem. Federal documentation rates the LUU-2B at roughly 1.8 million candlepower and says that from 1,000 feet it can illuminate a circle about 500 metres across. It burns magnesium at high temperature, producing an intense white light.[GovInfo]govinfo.govOpen source on govinfo.gov. From far away at night, the observer is therefore much more likely to see an isolated point of light than the parachute, smoke, flare body or aircraft responsible for it.

This is an important identification trap. A witness may accurately report that a light was bright, silent and apparently hovering; none of those observations by itself establishes that the source was physically hovering. Distance and altitude are generally unknown, and sound from an aircraft or flare release may never reach the observer at a useful level.

Why several flares can look like a formation

A group of parachute flares can be substantially stranger than a single one because the eye naturally connects nearby lights into a larger pattern. Several releases can form an arc, line or loose geometric arrangement even though the lights are independent objects.

Three features are especially characteristic.

Slow common drift. Flares released into broadly similar winds can move in approximately the same direction. Their separation may change gradually as individual parachutes encounter slightly different airflow. From a distant viewpoint, that resembles a formation changing shape rather than unrelated objects being carried by wind. Air Force operating guidance specifically identifies drift as part of flare behaviour rather than treating the devices as vertically falling lights.[E-Publishing]static.e-publishing.af.milOpen source on af.mil.

Long, overlapping burn periods. Five-minute illumination times allow several independently released flares to coexist in the sky.[E-Publishing]static.e-publishing.af.milOpen source on af.mil. If an aircraft releases them successively, the resulting lights need not ignite or extinguish together. A viewer may instead see one light appear, followed by another, with older flares going out while newer ones remain visible. That can suggest coordinated switching, a rotating formation or lights mounted on an unseen craft.

Abrupt disappearance. A flare does not have to fade gradually from view. It can burn out, be hidden by terrain or disappear into cloud or haze. The LUU-2 mechanism itself also changes at the end of its operating cycle: federal documentation says that after candle burnout an explosive bolt releases a parachute support cable so that the parachute collapses.[GovInfo]govinfo.govOpen source on govinfo.gov. From a distant viewpoint, the luminous point can consequently disappear with little visual warning.

There is another subtle effect. The same Federal Register description says that as the LUU-2 candle consumes its housing, the flare becomes lighter and its rate of fall slows during roughly the final two minutes.[GovInfo]govinfo.govOpen source on govinfo.gov. The intuitive expectation that a falling object should continually accelerate is therefore particularly misleading here: the parachute system is deliberately controlling the descent.

Phoenix shows both the strength and the danger of the flare explanation

The 13 March 1997 “Phoenix Lights” episode is the best-known illustration of why flare identification requires careful separation of events. Reports accumulated across Arizona over several hours, and accounts that are often grouped under one name did not all describe the same phenomenon. Later reporting and investigation distinguished an earlier travelling formation from a second display of brilliant lights south-west of Phoenix at around 10 p.m.[Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSkeptical Inquirer Alien Lights?At Phoenix, Stephenville, and ElsewhereMarch 1, 2015 — At around 8:30 on the night of March 13, 1997, residents “flares do not fly in for…Published: March 1, 2015

It is the later Phoenix display that has especially strong evidence for illumination flares. Contemporary reporting in July 1997 recorded the military’s disclosure that Maryland Air National Guard aircraft visiting Arizona had been dropping high-intensity flares over the bombing range south-west of Phoenix on the night of the sightings.[Las Vegas Sun]lasvegassun.commilitary now says flares may be cause of mysteriouLas Vegas SunMilitary now says flares may be cause of mysterious…25 Jul 1997 — It turns out visiting jets from the Maryland Air Nation… Later accounts identify the activity with A-10 aircraft operating on the Barry M. Goldwater training range.[Wikipedia]WikipediaPhoenix LightsPhoenix Lights

The visual evidence also fits that explanation. Subsequent analysis argued that the videotaped lights lay in the direction of the range and that their apparent disappearances were consistent with descending flares becoming hidden behind the Sierra Estrella mountains. Phoenix New Times later reported that a television crew recorded a separate military flare exercise whose appearance was remarkably similar to the March 1997 late-evening lights.[Phoenix New Times]phoenixnewtimes.comPhoenix New TimesThe 1997 "Phoenix Lights" are no mysteryMarch 14, 2014 — 14 Mar 2014 — Channel 12 filmed a similar dropping of flares by…Published: March 14, 2014

The case nevertheless demonstrates a major investigative risk: an explanation for one time window should not automatically be applied to every report made that night. The earlier Phoenix observations involved moving V- or chevron-shaped groups of lights and occurred well before the documented late-evening flare display. Even sources arguing for conventional explanations treat the two episodes separately.[Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSkeptical Inquirer Alien Lights?At Phoenix, Stephenville, and ElsewhereMarch 1, 2015 — At around 8:30 on the night of March 13, 1997, residents “flares do not fly in for…Published: March 1, 2015 Calling the entire Phoenix Lights episode “just flares” therefore collapses materially different reports into one event and makes the explanation less precise than the evidence permits.

That distinction matters beyond Phoenix. When several sightings occur around a military exercise, some may be parachute flares, others aircraft, and still others unrelated objects. A good identification follows each observation’s own time, bearing and behaviour rather than assigning one convenient cause to an entire evening.

Wind, terrain and viewing geometry can create misleading motion

Night-time light sightings are particularly vulnerable to errors in apparent motion because the observer normally lacks a known distance. A light descending vertically a long way away may appear almost fixed against the sky, while a moderate crosswind can produce more noticeable sideways movement than downward movement. The result can be described quite reasonably as “hovering and then moving sideways”.

Terrain can make the sequence look more deliberate still. In the Phoenix case, the Sierra Estrella range provided a foreground horizon that was difficult to perceive in darkness. A descending light crossing behind such a ridge can seem simply to switch off. Multiple flares at slightly different heights will cross the same hidden horizon at different times, creating a procession of apparent extinctions.[Phoenix New Times]phoenixnewtimes.comPhoenix New TimesThe 1997 "Phoenix Lights" are no mysteryMarch 14, 2014 — 14 Mar 2014 — Channel 12 filmed a similar dropping of flares by…Published: March 14, 2014

Brightness can also conceal useful references. A powerful point source can dominate a camera exposure and erase faint stars or landscape detail that would otherwise reveal its motion. This is one reason video showing a row of saturated blobs against a black sky often contains less positional information than its dramatic appearance suggests. Researchers examining the Phoenix material have argued that intense lights and poor background reference contributed to impressions of a coherent structure.[Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSkeptical Inquirer Alien Lights?At Phoenix, Stephenville, and ElsewhereMarch 1, 2015 — At around 8:30 on the night of March 13, 1997, residents “flares do not fly in for…Published: March 1, 2015

The reverse caution is equally important: movement inconsistent with plausible wind-driven descent should count against a flare hypothesis. A clearly measured object accelerating horizontally, reversing repeatedly against the local wind, maintaining a fixed low altitude for far longer than the relevant flare’s burn time, or travelling through a well-constrained three-dimensional path would require additional explanation. “Flares can drift” should not become a catch-all excuse for behaviour that has not actually been modelled.

Matching a sighting to military activity

Visual resemblance is best treated as the start of a flare investigation, not its conclusion. The most persuasive identifications combine several independent matches.

A useful assessment asks whether:

• The time matches. Training, weapons-range or illumination activity should overlap the sighting to within a plausible interval. A flare exercise two hours later cannot explain an earlier observation merely because it occurred on the same night.
• The bearing matches. The lights should appear in the direction of the training range or release area when viewed from the witness location. Multiple geographically separated videos can be especially valuable because intersecting lines of sight constrain the source region.
• The duration fits the flare type. Long-lived parachute illumination flares can remain visible for several minutes; short defensive countermeasure flares normally cannot. Federal documentation explicitly distinguishes LUU-2 illumination flares with approximately five-minute burns from countermeasure flares lasting under ten seconds.[GovInfo]govinfo.govOpen source on govinfo.gov.
• The vertical behaviour fits. Slow descent, eventual disappearance near a horizon and changing apparent spacing are expected. Air Force documentation confirms that illumination-flare planning must account for burn time, descent rate and drift.[E-Publishing]static.e-publishing.af.milOpen source on af.mil.
• Wind is compatible. Winds at the flare’s altitude matter more than surface wind. A convincing reconstruction should not assume that a ground-level breeze represents conditions thousands of feet above.
• Terrain is checked. Digital elevation data or a daylight photograph from the same location can reveal whether an apparently mid-air extinction actually coincides with a distant ridge.
• Operational records support the claim. Unit histories, range schedules, official statements, flight logs or credible contemporary reporting are much stronger evidence than the mere presence of a military base somewhere in the region.

The evidential hierarchy matters. “There is a bombing range nearby” establishes possibility. “Aircraft on that range were documented releasing the relevant flare type during the precise sighting window, in the observed direction, with trajectories matching the video” approaches an identification.

Conversely, failure to find a public exercise notice does not prove that the lights were extraordinary. Detailed military training records may be incomplete, unavailable or published long after an event. The appropriate result in that situation may simply be consistent with flares but unconfirmed.

When the flare explanation is strong — and when it is not

Parachute illumination flares deserve serious consideration when a UFO report describes extremely bright lights that remain visible for minutes, seem nearly stationary or drift gently, occur in a line or arc, and disappear sequentially over or near a military training area. Those features arise naturally from equipment expressly designed to produce powerful, slow-descending airborne illumination. US Air Force documentation confirms five-minute burn times, parachute suspension, substantial descent during operation and operational concern with wind drift.[E-Publishing]static.e-publishing.af.milOpen source on af.mil.

They are especially persuasive where an independent activity record closes the loop. The late-evening component of the Phoenix Lights is valuable precisely because the flare hypothesis does not depend only on resemblance: military training activity was reported for the relevant night, the lights appeared towards the range, and later flare exercises reproduced important features of the recorded display.[Deseret News]deseret.comflares not ufos caused light show military saysDeseret NewsFlares, not UFOs, caused light show, military says26 Jul 1997 — Visiting jets from the Maryland Air National Guard were using…

But flares should not be used as a generic label for every unexplained orange or white light. Investigators should be suspicious of an explanation that requires changing the sighting time, ignoring its direction, confusing short countermeasure flares with long-burning illumination devices or merging distinct episodes because they occurred in the same region. Phoenix itself demonstrates why that discipline matters: the strongest flare evidence pertains to a particular late-evening light display, not indiscriminately to every observation reported across Arizona that night.[Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSkeptical Inquirer Alien Lights?At Phoenix, Stephenville, and ElsewhereMarch 1, 2015 — At around 8:30 on the night of March 13, 1997, residents “flares do not fly in for…Published: March 1, 2015

The practical lesson for UFO and UAP identification is therefore narrower but more useful than “strange lights are often flares”. Parachute flares have a distinctive physical signature: very high brightness, minute-scale persistence, controlled descent, wind-driven drift and potentially staggered extinction. When those characteristics align with the event’s exact time window and documented military activity, an apparently hovering formation can be explained without requiring anything in the sky to have hovered at all.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Why Military Flares Can Resemble UFO Formations. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

The UFO Handbook: A Guide to Investigating, Evaluating, and R...

By Allan Hendry

An explanation of the usual reasons for confusing IFOs (identified flying objects) with UFOs and a survey of the tools used to investigat...

See on Amazon

Book

The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry

By Joseph Allen Hynek

Cited by the New York Review of Books as "the best brief for visitation," this classic study presents an analysis of UFO reports and conc...

See on Amazon

Book

UFOs Explained

By Philip J. Klass

Analyzing several UFO cases, the author exposes the myth of extraterrestrial visitors to earth.

See on Amazon

Book

The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects

By Edward J. Ruppelt

Edward J. Ruppelt's "The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects" serves as a pivotal text in the study of UFO phenomena, blending personal...

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon:The UFO : A to Investigating, Evaluating, and Reporting UFO Sightings booksThe UFO Experience: A Scientific InquiryUFOs Explained

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

Shop location

UsingUSA USA USAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.

Current eBay listing

Conspiracy Theory Poster Wall Print Gift UFO Aliens Flat Earth Moon Landing

GBP 18.97 | Free shippingNewSeller: forgevalleyprint (98.6% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT

GBP 10.76 | Free shippingNewSeller: andys-prints-uk (99.7% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

I Want To Believe UFO Poster Giclée Fine Art Heavyweight Print

GBP 21.95 | Free shippingNewSeller: mintprint77 (100.0% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

UFO Over Desert Highway Sci-Fi Abduction Poster Print Framed Canvas Wall Art

GBP 14.99 | Free shippingNewSeller: paradiseposters (99.6% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: static.e-publishing.af.mil
Link:https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/af_a3/publication/afman11-2mc-130jv3/afman11-2mc-130jv3.pdf

2. Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2010-06-08/pdf/2010-13748.pdf

3. Source: Wikipedia
Title: Phoenix Lights
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Lights

4. Source: deseret.com
Title: flares not ufos caused light show military says
Link:https://www.deseret.com/1997/7/26/19325702/flares-not-ufos-caused-light-show-military-says/

5. Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parachute

6. Source: Wikipedia
Title: Black triangle (UFO)
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_triangle_%28UFO%29

7. Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flare

8. Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-P32_4800-1226d01b08d0c7bf2f8de2cbd75b80cc/html/GOVPUB-P32_4800-1226d01b08d0c7bf2f8de2cbd75b80cc.htm

9. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 135/Tuesday,
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2014-07-15/pdf/2014-16454.pdf

10. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 61/Friday,
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2013-03-29/pdf/2013-07305.pdf

11. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: Federal Register/Vol. 80, No. 49/Friday,
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-03-13/pdf/2015-05797.pdf

12. Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-P32_4800-2064a21afecd316217058c82ba5ea2cc/html/GOVPUB-P32_4800-2064a21afecd316217058c82ba5ea2cc.htm

13. Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-P32_4800-2064a21afecd316217058c82ba5ea2cc/pdf/GOVPUB-P32_4800-2064a21afecd316217058c82ba5ea2cc.pdf

14. Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2011-11-18/xml/FR-2011-11-18.xml

15. Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-D221-PURL-gpo62002/pdf/GOVPUB-D221-PURL-gpo62002.pdf

16. Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CZIC-ht393-s6-p76-1979-v-2/html/CZIC-ht393-s6-p76-1979-v-2.htm

17. Source: governor.maryland.gov
Link:https://governor.maryland.gov/news/press-releases/governor-moore-joins-maryland-air-national-guard-honor-10c-thunderbolt-ii-flying-mission-during

18. Source: youtube.com
Title: Van Buren, Arkansas Parachute Flares
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ookgfo9Kwgg

19. Source: youtube.com
Title: The Phoenix Lights
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SUJTh6Hs-I

20. Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Title: Skeptical Inquirer Alien Lights?
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/2015/03/alien-lights-at-phoenix-stephenville-and-elsewhere-a-postmortem/

Published: March 1, 2015

21. Source: lasvegassun.com
Title: military now says flares may be cause of mysteriou
Link:https://lasvegassun.com/news/1997/jul/25/military-now-says-flares-may-be-cause-of-mysteriou/

22. Source: phoenixnewtimes.com
Link:https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/arts-culture/the-phoenix-lights-are-no-mystery-6661825/

Published: March 14, 2014

23. Source: af.mil
Link:https://www.af.mil/Portals/1/documents/Secretariat%20of%20the%20AF/SAF-FM/Budget%20-%202002/AFD-070223-112.pdf?ver=nXaCCDpLMrph5lAqB-pGCg%3D%3D

24. Source: af.mil
Title: AFD 110211 053
Link:https://www.af.mil/Portals/1/documents/Secretariat%20of%20the%20AF/SAF-FM/Budget%20-%202012/AFD-110211-053.pdf?ver=7oLk8T3kxJe6YT5u2h-xag%3D%3D

25. Source: af.mil
Title: AFD 070223 047
Link:https://www.af.mil/Portals/1/documents/Secretariat%20of%20the%20AF/SAF-FM/Budget%20-%202004/AFD-070223-047.pdf?ver=5zMIdXcwK52H6W4qKPcdrw%3D%3D

26. Source: af.mil
Link:https://www.af.mil/Portals/1/documents/Secretariat%20of%20the%20AF/SAF-FM/Budget%20-%202011/AFD-100127-159.pdf?ver=LjBBZgjlmEKsdKcbars4ig%3D%3D

27. Source: static.e-publishing.af.mil
Link:https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/af_a3/publication/dafman11-2ec-130jv3/dafman11-2ec-130jv3.pdf

28. Source: af.mil
Title: AFD 090511 050
Link:https://www.af.mil/Portals/1/documents/Secretariat%20of%20the%20AF/SAF-FM/Budget%20-%202010/AFD-090511-050.pdf?ver=R51OY_FykOkwCvrijL7rEQ%3D%3D

29. Source: static.e-publishing.af.mil
Title: hillafbi13 204
Link:https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/hillafb/publication/hillafbi13-204/hillafbi13-204.pdf

30. Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/authors/james-mcgaha/

31. Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/2012/05/the-roswellian-syndrome-how-some-ufo-myths-develop/

32. Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/volume/no-5-vol-38/

33. Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/volume/no-2-vol-21/

34. Source: nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link:https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/explore-the-collection/explore-by-time-period/postwar/ufo-reports/

35. Source: cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link:https://cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/aug-2009-research-guide.pdf

36. Source: cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Title: nationalarchives.gov.ukchapter 1
Link:https://cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/bsi-0004.pdf

37. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/149844915349213/posts/2853199748347036/

38. Source: eppingforestdc.gov.uk
Link:https://www.eppingforestdc.gov.uk/app/uploads/2024/01/spirit-of-north-weald-booklet-7.pdf

39. Source: youtube.com
Title: Phoenix Lights
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1fW1l1sh-A

40. Source: darkforestarchive.com
Link:https://darkforestarchive.com/catalog/doc/Phoenix_Lights__29_skepticalinquirer.org.html

41. Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Link:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69a055dc3e672177d0bc7735/Tornado_Field_Development_Environmental_Statement.pdf

42. Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Link:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7ebee940f0b6230268b464/20140808_MOD_Acronyms_and_Abbreviations.pdf

43. Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Link:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7c40ede5274a2041cf2c25/se1-082-tr-e-e.pdf

44. Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Link:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7c86c040f0b626628acaef/27th_Round_Outer_Moray_Firth_Blocks_AA.pdf

45. Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Link:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a79f6f9e5274a319e776ded/27th_Round_Southern_North_Sea_Blocks_AA.pdf

46. Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Link:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a79ff09e5274a34770e3813/27th_Round_Irish_Sea_Blocks_AA.pdf

47. Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Link:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7c43e840f0b62dffde0eec/27th_Round_Southern_North_Sea_Blocks_AA.pdf

48. Source: dictionary.cambridge.org
Link:https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/parachute

49. Source: phoenixnewtimes.com
Title: phoenix lights ufo mystery explanations 19105870
Link:https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/arts-culture/phoenix-lights-ufo-mystery-explanations-19105870/

50. Source: planeandpilotmag.com
Title: the phoenix lights
Link:https://planeandpilotmag.com/the-phoenix-lights/

51. Source: theuapmap.com
Link:https://theuapmap.com/phoenix.html

52. Source: kids.kiddle.co
Title: Phoenix Lights
Link:https://kids.kiddle.co/Phoenix_Lights

53. Source: stampaday.wordpress.com
Title: the phoenix lights
Link:https://stampaday.wordpress.com/2019/03/13/the-phoenix-lights/

Additional References

54. Source: 175wg.ang.af.mil
Link:https://www.175wg.ang.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/4136062/maryland-air-national-guard-divests-first-a-10/

Published: March 2024

55. Source: youtube.com
Title: DCS World: F-5E SUU-2 Target Illumination Flares
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7e0jc97ifcA

56. Source: youtube.com
Title: SCARY ALIEN INVASION CONSPIRACY THEORY || NOT ALONE || Ep.4
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vg_qU69Hj1w

57. Source: youtube.com
Title: Military Night Flare Exercise At Magilligan Point
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5K8A6E-J5HQ

58. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/theliverpoolecho/posts/pulsing-lights-turn-sky-bright-orange-over-merseyside-visit-the-echo-website-for/6101641079901769/

59. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/FAQ/

60. Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/reel/DV0uaxgDGAx/?hl=en

61. Source: wescomdefence.com
Link:https://wescomdefence.com/product/battlefield-illumination/

62. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/ABC15/posts/do-you-believe-mysterious-[formations

63. Source: dzsports.co.uk
Link:https://dzsports.co.uk/