Why Ten Minutes of Video Still Wasn't Enough

Introduction

PR-018 is a useful counterexample to the idea that a UFO video becomes easier to identify simply because it lasts longer. The case contains 10 minutes and 30 seconds of infrared footage recorded from a US military platform in Europe in 2024. After analysing it, the US All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) reached an important but limited conclusion: it was highly confident that the footage showed a physical object, yet it still could not make a more specific attribution. AARO therefore left PR-018 unresolved.[DVIDS]dvidshub.netVideo - PR-018, Unresolved UAP Report, Europe 2024December 4, 2025…Published: December 4, 2025

The case illustrates the difference between seeing an object for a long time and measuring an object well enough to identify it. A long video can repeatedly record the same ambiguity. Unless the observation also supplies information such as range, sensor characteristics, platform motion and corroborating measurements, investigators may be unable to convert an object’s appearance on a screen into its actual size, speed, trajectory or identity. That is why PR-018 belongs among cases unresolved through missing information rather than cases demonstrated to have extraordinary properties.

What investigators could establish from PR-018

PR-018 came to AARO from United States European Command. The publicly released record says the footage was captured by an infrared sensor aboard a US military platform during 2024 and runs for exactly 10:30. AARO released the case publicly in December 2025.[AARO]aaro.milUAP ImageryAARO UAP Imagery…

That recording did answer one significant question. AARO says it assesses with high confidence that a physical object is present. This is stronger than merely saying that an unexplained patch of light or thermal contrast appears on a sensor display. In some other AARO infrared cases, investigators have been unable to determine whether a recorded contrast represented a physical source, a thermal reflection, an environmental temperature difference or a sensor/display effect. PR-018 advanced beyond that basic uncertainty.[AARO]aaro.milUAP ImageryAARO UAP Imagery…

But the analysis stopped well short of identification. AARO describes the object’s morphology, performance characteristics and behaviour as “unremarkable” and says those characteristics do not warrant further analysis with the evidence currently available. At the same time, the office says it would investigate the case again if further information became available that permitted a more conclusive attribution.[DVIDS]dvidshub.netVideo - PR-018, Unresolved UAP Report, Europe 2024December 4, 2025…Published: December 4, 2025

Those findings are not contradictory. They separate three questions that are easily conflated when looking at UFO footage:

That distinction is the central lesson of the case. “Unresolved” describes the limits of attribution. It does not, by itself, mean that investigators found unexplained high speed, unusual manoeuvres or technology outside known capabilities.

Why ten minutes does not supply the missing measurements

It is tempting to treat recording duration as a proxy for evidence quality. Ten minutes sounds far more informative than ten seconds. It can be — particularly if the longer observation captures a distinctive change in behaviour, provides different viewing geometries or allows another sensor to acquire the target. But duration alone does none of those things automatically.

A camera principally records how light or infrared radiation is distributed across its field of view. Without enough additional information, an image does not directly provide an object’s physical dimensions or distance. That creates a fundamental ambiguity: a relatively small nearby object and a much larger distant one can occupy a similar angular size in the image.

Distance also matters for interpreting motion. Movement across a two-dimensional image is not automatically equivalent to a known speed through three-dimensional space. AARO specifically warns that motion parallax can make stationary or slowly moving objects appear to move rapidly when observed from a moving platform. The effect depends on factors including observer motion, field of view and the object’s distance.[AARO]aaro.milAARO FAQ…

This means that another nine minutes of essentially the same viewing geometry may add many more frames without supplying the missing variable. If range remains unknown, investigators can have an increasingly detailed record of angular behaviour while remaining unable to calculate the object’s true kinematics confidently.

The same principle applies to appearance. Infrared imagery records radiation in wavelengths outside ordinary human vision and can be extremely useful, but what appears on the display depends on the sensor, its settings and the observing conditions. Knowing precisely how an image was produced therefore matters alongside seeing the image itself.

NASA’s independent UAP study highlighted exactly this problem. It found that UAP observations are commonly incidental rather than produced by experiments designed to characterise unknown aerial objects. Sensors may not have been designed or calibrated for the relevant measurement, while metadata can be missing. NASA listed information such as sensor type, sensitivity, acquisition time, storage characteristics, sensor location, temperature and exposure among the contextual information needed for rigorous interpretation.[NASA Science]smd-cms.nasa.govScience NASAUNIDENTIFIED ANOMALOUS PHENOMENA…

NASA consequently concluded that even cases accompanied by photographs or video can contain too little associated information for systematic scientific analysis. Its recommendations emphasised systematic calibration, multiple measurements and comprehensive sensor metadata rather than simply collecting more footage.[NASA]nasa.govUPDATE: NASA Shares UAP Independent Study Report; Names DirectorUPDATE: NASA Shares UAP Independent Study Report; Names Director - NASASeptember 14, 2023…Published: September 14, 2023

PR-018 fits that broader measurement problem unusually well because its length removes one easy explanation for inconclusiveness. Investigators were not dealing with a fleeting glimpse. They had more than ten minutes in which the object remained observable, yet the public assessment still stops at “physical object” rather than a specific identification. The bottleneck was therefore not merely the number of seconds recorded.

Longer footage can help — when it adds new information

PR-018 should not be read as showing that video duration is irrelevant. Longer observations can be extremely valuable when the additional time produces independent constraints rather than more copies of essentially the same measurement.

A useful comparison appears within AARO’s own published imagery. The office has resolved infrared recordings as balloons or birds when observable characteristics could be matched against external information. Its Middle East Red Balloon case, for example, was assessed with high confidence as a reflective foil balloon partly because the object’s behaviour correlated with recorded wind speed and direction. In other published cases, AARO has compared object morphology and flight behaviour with known bird migration patterns.[AARO]aaro.milUAP ImageryAARO UAP Imagery…

An even more striking example is AARO’s Al Taqaddum case. An infrared sensor recorded an unidentified object for about 17 minutes, considerably longer than PR-018. AARO eventually assessed it with high confidence as almost certainly a balloon because its morphology resembled known balloons and its performance aligned with lighter-than-air objects drifting with the wind.[AARO]aaro.milUAP ImageryAARO UAP Imagery…

The contrast is instructive. A long video becomes substantially more diagnostic when investigators can connect what the camera shows to quantities or patterns that discriminate between hypotheses. A track that agrees with measured winds supports a drifting-object explanation. Reliable range measurements can constrain size and velocity. Known aircraft positions can test whether an apparently unusual target corresponds to ordinary aviation traffic. Multiple viewing positions can help establish a three-dimensional trajectory.

Research programmes designed specifically to collect aerial data make the same point. The Galileo Project’s experimental systems use multiple cameras and sensor modalities precisely because two-dimensional imagery alone can leave distance and kinematics ambiguous. Its researchers have described using calibrated cameras to localise objects in three dimensions and derive velocity and acceleration, while combining visible, infrared, radar, radio and environmental measurements can provide independent tests of an observation.[arXiv]arxiv.orgarXiv A Hardware and Software Platform for Aerial Object LocalizationA Hardware and Software Platform for Aerial Object LocalizationMay 29, 2023…Published: May 29, 2023

In commissioning an infrared camera array, the project reported that some detected trajectories remained ambiguous even after extensive automated and manual analysis. The researchers said that distance and kinematic estimates or other sensor modalities would be needed to clarify those objects. That is the same measurement principle exposed by PR-018: more imagery and more physical information are not necessarily the same thing.[arXiv]arxiv.orgCommissioning An All-Sky Infrared Camera Array for Detection Of Airborne ObjectsNovember 12, 2024…Published: November 12, 2024

What additional observations could narrow PR-018

AARO’s public description of PR-018 does not publish a detailed inventory of every unavailable or withheld measurement, so it would be unwarranted to claim that one particular missing datum alone prevented identification. The defensible conclusion is narrower: AARO says further information would be necessary for a more conclusive attribution.[DVIDS]dvidshub.netVideo - PR-018, Unresolved UAP Report, Europe 2024December 4, 2025…Published: December 4, 2025

For a case of this general type, several kinds of additional observation could transform what investigators can infer:

Reliable range information. Knowing the object’s distance at multiple points would greatly reduce the size-speed ambiguity inherent in a single angular view.

Platform and sensor metadata. Precise position, orientation, field of view, zoom state, timestamps and other instrument parameters allow analysts to distinguish movement of the target from movement introduced by the observing platform and camera.

Independent tracking. Radar or another spatially separated sensor could provide measurements that do not depend on the same imaging geometry. NASA’s UAP study emphasises multiple, well-calibrated sensors for precisely this reason.[NASA]nasa.govUPDATE: NASA Shares UAP Independent Study Report; Names DirectorUPDATE: NASA Shares UAP Independent Study Report; Names Director - NASASeptember 14, 2023…Published: September 14, 2023

Environmental information. Wind direction and speed can be decisive when testing a balloon or other windborne-object hypothesis, as AARO’s resolved balloon cases demonstrate.[AARO]aaro.milUAP ImageryAARO UAP Imagery…

Comparable visible-light or multispectral imagery. A second spectral view may reveal features obscured or distorted in one sensor band and can help distinguish physical characteristics from wavelength-dependent imaging effects. NASA specifically recommended multispectral or hyperspectral approaches as part of better UAP data collection.[UFO Transparency]ufotransparency.comOpen source on ufotransparency.com.

Correlated conventional traffic data. Aircraft, drones and other known traffic become much easier to test as candidates when exact time and position can be compared with independent records.

AARO itself advises that scientifically useful UAP reporting should include metadata such as GPS coordinates and timestamps alongside imagery, and points to recorded radio-frequency information with location and timing as another potentially useful source.[AARO]aaro.milAARO FAQ…

What PR-018 actually demonstrates

The most defensible interpretation of PR-018 is modest but important. The recording was good enough for investigators to become highly confident that they were looking at a physical object. It was not informative enough for them to identify that object more specifically. Nor, according to AARO, did its observed morphology, behaviour or performance establish anything remarkable.[DVIDS]dvidshub.netVideo - PR-018, Unresolved UAP Report, Europe 2024December 4, 2025…Published: December 4, 2025

That makes PR-018 a particularly clear example of why UFO cases can survive in an unidentified category without providing evidence of extraordinary craft. The unresolved element can be identity, rather than physical existence or anomalous performance.

Ten minutes of video may improve confidence that an observed feature persists, reveal aspects of its shape or behaviour and rule out some imaging artefacts. But recording duration cannot retrospectively create range measurements, additional viewing angles, calibrated sensor information or independent observations that were never collected.

For UFO and UAP analysis, the useful question is therefore not simply “How much video is there?” It is “What physical quantities can actually be recovered from it?” PR-018 supplied enough information to establish an object, but apparently not enough discriminating information to turn that object into an identification. That gap between prolonged observation and adequate measurement is precisely how a long UFO video can remain unresolved.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Why Ten Minutes of Video Still Wasn't Enough. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry

By Joseph Allen Hynek

The author belives that a number of UFO siting are still to be explained.

See on Amazon

Book

The UFO Handbook: A Guide to Investigating, Evaluating, and R...

By Allan Hendry

An explanation of the usual reasons for confusing IFOs (identified flying objects) with UFOs and a survey of the tools used to investigat...

See on Amazon

Book

The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark

By Carl Sagan

NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • From the renowned astronomer and author of Cosmos comes a “powerful [and] stirring defense of informed ration...

See on Amazon

Book

How to Think About Weird Things: Critical Thinking for a New Age

By Theodore Schick, Lewis Vaughn

First published 1994. Subjects: Critical thinking, Curiosities and wonders, Mind, body, spirit: disciplines & techniques, Parapsychology,...

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon:The UFO Experience: A Scientific InquiryThe UFO : A to Investigating, Evaluating, and Reporting UFO Sightings booksThe Demon Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

Shop location

UsingUSA USA USAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.

Current eBay listing

VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT

GBP 10.76 | Free shippingNewSeller: andys-prints-uk (99.7% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

UFO Over Desert Highway Sci-Fi Abduction Poster Print Framed Canvas Wall Art

GBP 14.99 | Free shippingNewSeller: paradiseposters (99.6% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

I Want To Believe UFO Poster Giclée Fine Art Heavyweight Print

GBP 21.95 | Free shippingNewSeller: mintprint77 (100.0% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

Conspiracy Theory Poster Wall Print Gift UFO Aliens Flat Earth Moon Landing

GBP 18.97 | Free shippingNewSeller: forgevalleyprint (98.6% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: aaro.mil
Title: UAP Imagery
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/4/

2. Source: aaro.mil
Title: UAP Imagery
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/ftag/MSF0951a18/

3. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/FAQ/

4. Source: smd-cms.nasa.gov
Title: Science NASA
Link:https://smd-cms.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report.pdf

5. Source: nasa.gov
Title: UPDATE: NASA Shares UAP Independent Study Report; Names Director
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/update-nasa-shares-uap-independent-study-report-names-director/

Published: September 14, 2023

6. Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv A Hardware and Software Platform for Aerial Object Localization
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18555

Published: May 29, 2023

7. Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18566

8. Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07956

Published: November 12, 2024

9. Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: satellite data evaluation
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/earth-science/csda/satellite-data-evaluation/

10. Source: asapdata.arc.nasa.gov
Link:https://asapdata.arc.nasa.gov/calibration.html

11. Source: seabass.gsfc.nasa.gov
Link:https://seabass.gsfc.nasa.gov/wiki/metadataheaders

12. Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/science-research/earth-science/joint-earth-observation-mission-quality-assessment-framework-optical-guidelines-documents-released/

13. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-Imagery-Acc-Table/

14. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-UAP-Report-Documents/

15. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-UAP-Report-Documents/poster/dividLink/

16. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-UAP-Report-Documents/poster/

17. Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/uap/

18. Source: aaro.mil
Title: AAR O UAP Records
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Records/fbclid/IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR0F9nbI4TTQyu8d96BuOtBb1uVQuvapZEvLug7mWxQC4ZqlNDrM5_ejMt4_aem_q0czZMebJdVWJ-6XDLdWAA/

19. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/

20. Source: ndacc.larc.nasa.gov
Title: appendix vi ultraviolet spectro radiometry
Link:https://ndacc.larc.nasa.gov/about/protocols/appendix-vi-ultraviolet-spectro-radiometry

21. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/988676/dvpcc/false/

22. Source: nasa.gov
Title: NAS A to Release, Discuss Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Report
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-to-release-discuss-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-report/

23. Source: nasa.gov
Title: NAS A Provides Coverage of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Meeting
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-provides-coverage-of-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-meeting/

24. Source: nasa.gov
Title: NAS A Announces Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Study Team Members
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/general/nasa-announces-unidentified-aerial-phenomena-study-team-members/

25. Source: podaac.jpl.nasa.gov
Title: JASON CS S6A L1A ALT HR STC F
Link:https://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/dataset/JASON_CS_S6A_L1A_ALT_HR_STC_F

26. Source: podaac.jpl.nasa.gov
Title: JASON CS S6A L1B ALT HR STC F
Link:https://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/dataset/JASON_CS_S6A_L1B_ALT_HR_STC_F

27. Source: podaac.jpl.nasa.gov
Title: JASON CS S6A L1B ALT LR STC F
Link:https://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/dataset/JASON_CS_S6A_L1B_ALT_LR_STC_F

28. Source: ndacc.larc.nasa.gov
Title: appendix vii uv vis
Link:https://ndacc.larc.nasa.gov/about/protocols/appendix-vii-uv-vis

29. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006093/dvpcc/false/

30. Source: seabass.gsfc.nasa.gov
Title: data submission special requirements
Link:https://seabass.gsfc.nasa.gov/wiki/data_submission_special_requirements

31. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20190028665.pdf

32. Source: catalog.data.gov
Title: messenger e v h mla 3 4 cdr rdr data v1 0 ced5e
Link:https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/messenger-e-v-h-mla-3-4-cdr-rdr-data-v1-0-ced5e

33. Source: catalog.data.gov
Title: messenger e v h mercury laser altimeter 2 edr raw data v1 0 de134
Link:https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/messenger-e-v-h-mercury-laser-altimeter-2-edr-raw-data-v1-0-de134

34. Source: uavsar.jpl.nasa.gov
Link:https://uavsar.jpl.nasa.gov/science/documents/calibration.html

35. Source: icesat.gsfc.nasa.gov
Title: GLAH01 data dict
Link:https://icesat.gsfc.nasa.gov/icesat/hdf5_products/data_dicts/GLAH01_data_dict.html

36. Source: icesat.gsfc.nasa.gov
Title: GLAH02 data dict
Link:https://icesat.gsfc.nasa.gov/icesat/hdf5_products/data_dicts/GLAH02_data_dict.html

37. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20040182597

38. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19970001837

39. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19750013517

40. Source: pds.nasa.gov
Title: view Collection.jsp
Link:https://pds.nasa.gov/ds-view/pds/viewCollection.jsp?identifier=urn%3Anasa%3Apds%3Anh_documents%3Aalice

41. Source: pds.nasa.gov
Title: view Collection.jsp
Link:https://pds.nasa.gov/ds-view/pds/viewCollection.jsp?identifier=urn%3Anasa%3Apds%3Anh_alice%3Acalibration_files&version=1.0

42. Source: glihtdata.gsfc.nasa.gov
Link:https://glihtdata.gsfc.nasa.gov/

43. Source: pds.nasa.gov
Link:https://pds.nasa.gov/datasearch/keyword-search/search.jsp?f.facet_investigation.facet.prefix=&f.facet_target.facet.prefix=&fq=&q=instrument-type%3A+magnetic&start=3300

44. Source: pds.nasa.gov
Link:https://pds.nasa.gov/services/search/search?f.facet_target.facet.prefix=&f.facet_type.facet.prefix=2%2Cbundle%2C&fq=&fq=facet_type%3A%221%2Cbundle%22&q=free+snapscore+hack%2C%E3%80%902024+TelegramChannel%3AKunghac%E3%80%91snapchat+got+hacked%2Csnapchat+my+eyes+only+hacked%2Csnapchat+best+friends+hack%2Csnapchat+password+brute+force%2Cwebsites+to+hack+snapchat%2Csnaphackv3%2Csnapchathacktool%2Csnapchat+2fa+hack%2Chack+snapchat+photos%2Csnapchat+premium+hack%2C….a3ba

45. Source: pds.nasa.gov
Link:https://pds.nasa.gov/services/search/search?f.facet_instrument.facet.prefix=2%2Cspectrometer%2C&fq=facet_instrument%3A%221%2Cspectrometer%22&q=credit+fc26+Visitez+le+site+Buyfc26coins.com++Processus+hyper+simple+pour+des+FC+coins+rapides.AdHW

46. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-Imagery-Fixed-Table/

47. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/

48. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Inactive-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-DT-Records/

49. Source: aaro.mil
Title: AAR O UAP Trends All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office UAP REPORTING TRENDS
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/UAP-Reporting-Trends/

50. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-UAP-Case-RR-Data-Table/

51. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Records/-1/

52. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Resources/Historical-Record-Reports/Volume-II/

53. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Inactive-Parent/AARO-Records-Tabs/

54. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19660009122

55. Source: dvidshub.net
Link:https://www.dvidshub.net/video/988676/pr-018-unresolved-uap-report-europe-2024

Published: December 4, 2025

56. Source: ufotransparency.com
Link:https://ufotransparency.com/files/decade-2020s-nasa-uap-independent-study-report-2023-uap-independent-study-team-final-report

57. Source: ufotransparency.com
Link:https://ufotransparency.com/files/intl-uk-project-condign-volume-1-uap-vol1-annex-atod

58. Source: uapufo.org
Link:https://uapufo.org/topics/aaro

59. Source: uapufo.org
Link:https://uapufo.org/entities/aaro

Additional References

60. Source: youtube.com
Title: Top Declassified UFO Videos Released by the Pentagon
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oER70vPK1aU

61. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzmK7tKcn9A

62. Source: youtube.com
Title: UAP Video
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2eQxMtzYO4

63. Source: odni.gov
Link:https://www.odni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications/reports-publications-2026/223-about/organization/chief-information-officer?start=35

64. Source: defense.gov
Link:https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/article/3368109/dod-working-to-better-understand-resolve-anomalous-phenomena/

65. Source: odni.gov
Link:https://www.odni.gov/index.php/who-we-are/organizations/ic-cio/ic-technical-specifications/fine-access-control

66. Source: odni.gov
Link:https://www.odni.gov/index.php/who-we-are/organizations/ic-cio/ic-technical-specifications/intelligence-publications

67. Source: odni.gov
Link:https://www.odni.gov/index.php/who-we-are/organizations/ic-cio/ic-technical-specifications/need-to-know-metadata

68. Source: odni.gov
Link:https://www.odni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/press-releases-2023/3668-odni-releases-annual-report-on-unidentified-aerial-phenomena

69. Source: odni.gov
Link:https://www.odni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications/reports-publications-2021/3550-preliminary-assessment-unidentified-aerial-phenomena