Within Missing Data
Was PR 008 Really Showing a Heat Source?
PR-008 shows how an apparent infrared heat signature can remain ambiguous when investigators lack the data needed to identify its physical cause.
On this page
- What appears in the infrared footage
- Four possible causes of the apparent heat signature
- Which missing measurements prevent a firm conclusion
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
PR-008 is an unusually clear example of how an infrared UFO or UAP recording can remain unresolved without providing evidence of extraordinary technology. The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) says the case came from US European Command and consists of 1 minute 21 seconds of infrared video recorded from a US military platform in Europe in 2022. The imagery contains what AARO calls an “apparent heat signature” whose characteristics are consistent with a physical object. Yet investigators could not establish what actually produced that signature.[AARO]aaro.milUAP ImageryUAP Imagery
That distinction is crucial. AARO did not verify that PR-008 shows a hot object. Its published assessment leaves four materially different possibilities open: thermal radiation emitted by a physical source; infrared radiation reflected from a physical source; a heat differential in the environment; or an error in the sensor display. AARO also says the available data are insufficient to evaluate the phenomenon’s performance characteristics.[AARO]aaro.milUAP ImageryUAP Imagery
PR-008 therefore illustrates a central problem in UFO investigation: an image can contain a striking and genuine sensor signal while still lacking the measurements needed to identify its physical cause.
What appears in the infrared footage
The public record for PR-008 is limited but specific. AARO’s official imagery catalogue identifies it as an unresolved report from Europe in 2022, submitted by US European Command. The source was an infrared sensor aboard a US military platform. The Department of Defense’s DVIDS archive gives the recording a duration of 1:21 and lists the footage as AARO material.[AARO]aaro.milUAP ImageryUAP Imagery
The most important phrase in AARO’s assessment is “apparent heat signature”. That wording is more cautious than saying that the footage establishes a hot object. A thermal or infrared detector measures electromagnetic radiation reaching its detector and converts variations in that signal into an image. The appearance of a bright, dark or otherwise contrasting region therefore demonstrates a difference in the detected infrared signal; determining what physical circumstances produced that difference is a separate analytical problem.
That problem is familiar in ordinary thermography. A surface’s infrared appearance depends not only on its temperature but also on its emissivity — its effectiveness at emitting thermal radiation — and on reflected radiation from the surroundings. FLIR explains that a highly polished, low-emissivity surface can behave rather like an infrared mirror. A relatively cool object can consequently register an apparently higher temperature if it reflects radiation from a warmer source.[FLIR]flir.comHow Does Emissivity Affect Thermal Imaging? | FlirHow Does Emissivity Affect Thermal Imaging? | FlirNovember 1, 2021… Fluke likewise notes that opaque surfaces can produce a combination of emitted and reflected radiation, requiring corrections for emissivity and reflected temperature when reliable temperature measurements are required.[Fluke]fluke.comOpen source on fluke.com.
None of this proves that reflection explains PR-008. It explains why AARO cannot infer from the image alone that the displayed contrast is direct evidence of an unusually hot object.
There is an equally important second limitation. AARO states that PR-008’s available data are insufficient to evaluate its performance characteristics.[AARO]aaro.milUAP ImageryUAP Imagery In other words, the public assessment does not establish extraordinary speed, acceleration, manoeuvrability or other unusual flight performance. What looks like movement in an airborne sensor image cannot automatically be converted into real-world velocity without adequate information about range, viewing geometry, sensor pointing and the motion of the observing platform.
PR-008 is therefore unresolved on two connected levels: investigators cannot confidently establish what produced the infrared contrast, and they cannot derive enough reliable physical information from the available data to characterise the phenomenon’s performance.
Four possible causes of the apparent heat signature
AARO’s assessment is especially valuable because it explicitly identifies four alternatives rather than simply labelling the image unexplained. Those possibilities show how substantially different physical situations can remain compatible with the same infrared footage.[AARO]aaro.milUAP ImageryUAP Imagery
Thermal emission from a physical source. The intuitive interpretation is that a real object emitted infrared radiation because of its temperature. This is entirely possible within AARO’s assessment. If so, PR-008 could be showing a physical target with thermal characteristics different from its surroundings. But even that would not identify the target. Aircraft, engines, animals, balloons warmed by sunlight and numerous other objects can generate infrared contrast under suitable conditions. More importantly, the displayed intensity alone does not supply the missing distance, dimensions, composition or trajectory.
Thermal reflection from a physical source. A real object could also be present while the apparent thermal signature does not represent heat generated by it. Low-emissivity materials can reflect infrared radiation from other parts of the scene. FLIR illustrates this problem with reflective metal surfaces: the camera can detect the reflected thermal environment rather than the object’s own temperature.[FLIR]flir.comHow Does Emissivity Affect Thermal Imaging? | FlirHow Does Emissivity Affect Thermal Imaging? | FlirNovember 1, 2021… Fluke similarly warns that reflected radiation is unrelated to the surface’s actual temperature and must be accounted for when making radiometric measurements.[Fluke]fluke.comOpen source on fluke.com.
This possibility is particularly important for interpreting the phrase “heat signature”. Even if investigators could establish independently that an object occupied the relevant pixels, it would not necessarily follow that the apparent temperature contrast represented heat produced by that object. AARO specifically preserves emission and reflection as separate hypotheses for PR-008.[AARO]aaro.milUAP ImageryUAP Imagery
A heat differential in the environment. AARO also says the source might be an environmental temperature difference rather than radiation associated with a discrete object.[DVIDS]dvidshub.netVideo - PR-008, Unresolved UAP Report, Europe 2022January 1, 2022… An infrared sensor maps differences in received radiation across its field of view, and coherent regions of contrast need not always correspond neatly to solid bodies. Atmospheric or environmental structure can therefore complicate an apparently object-like image.
That matters because human visual perception is highly inclined to treat compact regions moving against a background as discrete objects. Infrared imagery does not remove that interpretative problem; it changes the information on which the interpretation is based.
Sensor display error. Finally, AARO explicitly includes a sensor-display problem among the possibilities.[AARO]aaro.milUAP ImageryUAP Imagery This should not be read as an AARO finding that PR-008 is an artefact. It means that the evidence available to investigators was insufficient to eliminate an instrument-related explanation.
The distinction is important. A sensor image is the end product of a chain involving optics, a detector, calibration, signal processing and a display. Establishing that a feature is visible on the display does not by itself demonstrate that an equivalent structure existed in the external scene. The evidential question is therefore not simply “is something visible?” but “which part of the measurement chain generated the observed contrast?”
Why the footage cannot establish unusual performance
The absence of sufficient performance data is not a minor technical qualification. It controls what can legitimately be claimed about the case.
A camera measures angular information directly: where something appears within its field of view and how that apparent position changes. Physical quantities such as an object’s actual size, altitude, distance and velocity require additional constraints. A small nearby target and a much larger distant target can occupy similar numbers of pixels. Likewise, apparent rapid movement across an image can arise from target motion, sensor motion, aircraft motion, changing viewing direction or combinations of those factors.
AARO’s analysis of the separate GoFast UAP video demonstrates how much supporting information is needed to move beyond visual impressions. In that case, the display provided the sensor-to-target range, camera azimuth and elevation, and the observing aircraft’s altitude, speed and bank angle. Even with those measurements, the aircraft’s exact location and heading were unavailable, so AARO could calculate only a range of possible target speeds and headings rather than a unique solution.[AARO]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil.
That comparison does not imply that PR-008 and GoFast depict the same kind of object. It illustrates the measurement problem. If analysts cannot adequately constrain geometry, a dramatic-looking movement on a screen does not translate automatically into an extraordinary physical velocity.
AARO’s statement about PR-008 is consequently significant for what it does not claim. The agency does not report a verified velocity, acceleration, altitude or anomalous manoeuvre. Instead, it says the data are insufficient to evaluate performance.[AARO]aaro.milUAP ImageryUAP Imagery Describing PR-008 as evidence of an object displaying extraordinary flight characteristics would therefore go beyond the published assessment.
Which missing measurements prevent a firm conclusion?
A limitation of the public PR-008 record must be made explicit: AARO does not publish a detailed checklist specifying every missing data field for this case. It would therefore be unjustified to claim, for example, that a particular piece of telemetry was definitely never collected merely because it is absent from the public release.
What can be established is that the dataset available for analysis was insufficient to determine the source of the infrared signature and insufficient to evaluate performance. Several categories of measurement are especially relevant to resolving exactly those ambiguities.
Radiometric and calibration information would help determine what physical quantity the displayed contrast represents. A scientifically useful infrared measurement needs more than the visible rendering of a video frame. Information about detector response, calibration and image processing can be essential when deciding whether contrast corresponds to a real external radiance difference or something generated or altered by the imaging system.
Emissivity and environmental information matter when interpreting infrared radiation as temperature. As the thermography guidance from FLIR and Fluke demonstrates, emitted and reflected infrared radiation can contribute simultaneously to what a detector receives.[Fluke]fluke.comOpen source on fluke.com. Without sufficient information to discriminate between them, the apparent thermal character of a feature can remain ambiguous.
Range is crucial for physical scale. Knowing how many pixels a feature occupies does not uniquely determine its real dimensions without knowing its distance and the relevant optical geometry. Range also becomes critical when apparent angular motion is converted into linear velocity.
Platform and sensor geometry are needed to distinguish motion of the target from motion introduced by the observing system. Aircraft position and velocity, sensor azimuth and elevation, field of view and changes in pointing can all constrain a reconstructed trajectory. The GoFast analysis shows concretely how AARO uses precisely this sort of information when it is available.[AARO]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil.
Independent observations provide another way to break the ambiguity. Radar, another infrared or electro-optical system, or other independently recorded telemetry can test whether a feature seen in one sensor channel corresponds to a physical object and can supply measurements unavailable from the original imagery.
This need for multiple measurements is not unique to PR-008. NASA’s independent UAP study concluded that scientific analysis of UAP is impeded by limited high-quality observations. Its recommendations emphasised systematic calibration, multiple measurements and thorough sensor metadata as prerequisites for creating reliable datasets.[NASA]nasa.govUPDATE: NASA Shares UAP Independent Study Report; Names DirectorUPDATE: NASA Shares UAP Independent Study Report; Names Director
Later cases make PR-008’s data problem clearer
AARO’s subsequent imagery releases provide useful context because some later unresolved infrared cases describe the evidential gap more explicitly than the short PR-008 entry does.
For a Middle East 2023 recording lasting 8 minutes 15 seconds, AARO reported an apparent thermal contrast that might be consistent with a physical object. Yet it said that, because corroborating telemetry or multi-modal sensor data were absent, it could not determine whether the signature represented a sensor artefact, thermal emission from a physical source or reflected infrared radiation. A Middle East 2024 case lasting 6 minutes 42 seconds received essentially the same assessment.[AARO]aaro.milUAP ImageryUAP Imagery
Those cases should not be used to claim that PR-008 lacked precisely the same telemetry; AARO’s public PR-008 description does not say that. They do, however, demonstrate how the agency itself understands this class of ambiguity. More video does not necessarily solve it. Eight minutes of single-sensor imagery can remain inconclusive if the measurements needed to discriminate between competing physical explanations are absent.
A resolved infrared case shows the opposite outcome. At Al Taqaddum Air Base in Iraq, an infrared sensor aboard an aerostat recorded an unidentified object for 17 minutes 30 seconds in October 2017. AARO eventually assessed with high confidence that it was consistent with a cluster of fully and partially inflated balloons. The agency used full-motion-video and pixel analysis, while geolocation data helped it assess speed and direction; its published resolution gives an assessed altitude of roughly 850–2,200 feet and speed of about 4–14 mph.[AARO]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil.
The lesson for PR-008 is not that its source was necessarily balloons. It is that additional constraints can turn an ambiguous infrared feature into a testable physical model. Without those constraints, the set of viable explanations remains much wider.
Why “heat signature” is easy to overinterpret
The phrase “heat signature” sounds more definitive in everyday language than it is in infrared analysis. Readers can easily hear it as “the camera proved that a hot object was there”. PR-008 does not support that stronger formulation.
An infrared detector receives radiation. Determining the temperature and nature of the source requires an inference from that radiation, informed by properties of the target, environment, optics and sensor. A highly reflective surface provides an intuitive example: FLIR notes that a cool object can appear warmer to a thermal camera when it reflects radiation from a nearby heat source.[FLIR]flir.comHow Does Emissivity Affect Thermal Imaging? | FlirHow Does Emissivity Affect Thermal Imaging? | FlirNovember 1, 2021… The pixels are real measurements, but a naïve interpretation of what caused them can still be wrong.
PR-008 therefore presents an inverse problem. Investigators observe an effect at the detector and attempt to reconstruct the physical conditions that caused it. If thermal emission, thermal reflection, environmental contrast and sensor error all remain compatible with the observations, the imagery does not supply a unique solution.
This is exactly where “unresolved” can be misunderstood in UFO discussions. The word does not mean that investigators have demonstrated an object whose behaviour defeats conventional physics. In PR-008, AARO’s own description says the opposite of such a conclusion: the source of the displayed signature cannot be established, and its performance characteristics cannot be evaluated from the available data.[AARO]aaro.milUAP ImageryUAP Imagery
What PR-008 actually establishes
The strongest evidence-based conclusion is narrower than either an extraordinary interpretation or a confident debunking.
PR-008 establishes that US European Command submitted an infrared recording made by a US military platform in Europe in 2022; that the recording lasts 1 minute 21 seconds; and that AARO considers the apparent heat signature to have characteristics consistent with a physical object. But AARO cannot determine whether the displayed signature came from direct thermal emission, reflected infrared radiation, an environmental temperature difference or a sensor-display error. Nor does the available dataset allow AARO to evaluate the phenomenon’s performance characteristics.[AARO]aaro.milUAP ImageryUAP Imagery
The case therefore does not establish that there was no physical object. AARO explicitly retains physical-source explanations. But neither does it establish that a hot craft was present, much less that such a craft displayed anomalous propulsion or extraordinary performance. Both stronger conclusions exceed the evidence.
PR-008’s real importance lies in this gap between detecting a signal and identifying its cause. Infrared imagery can provide information invisible to the human eye and can be extraordinarily useful when supported by calibration, geometry, range, telemetry and independent observations. Without enough of those constraints, however, a visually compelling thermal contrast can remain scientifically underdetermined.
NASA’s independent UAP study framed the wider problem in similar terms: the present body of UAP observations contains too few consistent, detailed and curated measurements for firm scientific conclusions, and better calibration, multiple measurements and complete metadata are needed.[NASA]nasa.govUPDATE: NASA Shares UAP Independent Study Report; Names DirectorUPDATE: NASA Shares UAP Independent Study Report; Names Director PR-008 is a concrete case-level illustration of that principle.
Its unresolved status should therefore be read literally. Something produced the recorded infrared contrast, but the available evidence does not determine which of several materially different causes produced it. That is not evidence that every ordinary explanation failed. It is evidence that the dataset cannot reliably choose among them.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Was PR 008 Really Showing a Heat Source?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Handbook: A Guide to Investigating, Evaluating, and R...
An explanation of the usual reasons for confusing IFOs (identified flying objects) with UFOs and a survey of the tools used to investigat...
The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • From the renowned astronomer and author of Cosmos comes a “powerful [and] stirring defense of informed ration...
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
The author belives that a number of UFO siting are still to be explained.
Infrared Thermal Imaging: Fundamentals, Research and Applicat...
This richly illustrated hands-on guide is designed for researchers, teachers and practitioners. The huge selection of examples taken from...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Current eBay listing
I Want To Believe UFO Poster Giclée Fine Art Heavyweight Print
Current eBay listing
VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT
Endnotes
1.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-Imagery-Acc-Table/
Source snippet
Next - AARO UAP Imagery Acc Table...
2.
Source: jpl.nasa.gov
Link:https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/pia18833-nasa-spacecraft-maps-earths-global-emissivity/
Source snippet
NASA Jet Propulsion LaboratoryNASA Spacecraft Maps Earth's Global Emissivity | NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)October 20, 2014...
Published: October 20, 2014
3.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-Imagery-Fixed-Table/
Source snippet
Next - AARO UAP Imagery Acc Table...
4.
Source: flir.com
Title: How Does Emissivity Affect Thermal Imaging? | Flir
Link:https://www.flir.com/discover/professional-tools/how-does-emissivity-affect-thermal-imaging/
Source snippet
How Does Emissivity Affect Thermal Imaging? | FlirNovember 1, 2021...
Published: November 1, 2021
5.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: Science Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS)
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/mission/landsat/tirs/
Source snippet
NASA ScienceThermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) - NASA ScienceDecember 2, 2025...
Published: December 2, 2025
6.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: UPDATE: NASA Shares UAP Independent Study Report; Names Director
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/update-nasa-shares-uap-independent-study-report-names-director/
7.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: UAP Imagery
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/4/
8.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/FAQ/
9.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/UNCLASSIFIED-FY23_Consolidated_Annual_Report_on_UAP-Oct_25_2023_1236.pdf?ver=FDHBtn1AmOwRRjiCO6hBQQ%3D%3D
10.
Source: earth.gsfc.nasa.gov
Title: biosphere instrument calibration
Link:https://earth.gsfc.nasa.gov/bio/research/biosphere-instrument-calibration
11.
Source: earth.gsfc.nasa.gov
Title: thermal infrared
Link:https://earth.gsfc.nasa.gov/hydro/instruments/slap/thermal-infrared
12.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: landsat 8
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/mission/landsat-8/
13.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: landsat 9
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/mission/landsat-9/
14.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: satellite data evaluation
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/earth-science/csda/satellite-data-evaluation/
15.
Source: asapdata.arc.nasa.gov
Link:https://asapdata.arc.nasa.gov/calibration.html
16.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: portable remote imaging spectrometer prism
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/mission/portable-remote-imaging-spectrometer-prism/
17.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/mission/portable-remote-imaging-spectrometer-prism/instrument/
18.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: spectrometer characteristics
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/mission/portable-remote-imaging-spectrometer-prism/spectrometer-characteristics/
19.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/science-research/earth-science/joint-earth-observation-mission-quality-assessment-framework-optical-guidelines-documents-released/
20.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-UAP-Report-Documents/poster/dividLink/
21.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-UAP-Report-Documents/
22.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-UAP-Report-Documents/poster/
23.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: science overview
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/mission/clarreo-pathfinder/science-overview/
24.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: inter calibration
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/mission/clarreo-pathfinder/inter-calibration/
25.
Source: catalog.data.gov
Title: gov2MASS Calibration Scan Information Table
Link:https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/2mass-calibration-scan-information-table
26.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/uap/
27.
Source: landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov
Title: thermal infrared sensor tirs
Link:https://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/thermal-infrared-sensor-tirs/
28.
Source: data.nasa.gov
Title: aster l2 surface emissivity v004
Link:https://data.nasa.gov/dataset/aster-l2-surface-emissivity-v004
29.
Source: data.nasa.gov
Title: aster l1a reconstructed unprocessed instrument data v004
Link:https://data.nasa.gov/dataset/aster-l1a-reconstructed-unprocessed-instrument-data-v004
30.
Source: data.nasa.gov
Title: viirs npp land surface temperature and emissivity 6 min l2 swath 750m v002 0f114
Link:https://data.nasa.gov/dataset/viirs-npp-land-surface-temperature-and-emissivity-6-min-l2-swath-750m-v002-0f114
31.
Source: data.nasa.gov
Link:https://data.nasa.gov/dataset/0db20c9d-7122-4f32-86e8-0ef364c11802
32.
Source: data.nasa.gov
Title: aster l2 surface emissivity v003 1e2ed
Link:https://data.nasa.gov/dataset/aster-l2-surface-emissivity-v003-1e2ed
33.
Source: data.nasa.gov
Title: gov2MASS Calibration Scan Information Table
Link:https://data.nasa.gov/dataset/2mass-calibration-scan-information-table
34.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006159/dvpmoduleid/77396/
35.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006074/dvpcc/false/
36.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: NAS A’s Compact Infrared Cameras Enable New Science
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/technology/goddard-tech/compact-infrared-cameras/
37.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/988676/dvpcc/false/
38.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1014099/dvpcc/false/
39.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1014097/dvpcc/false/
40.
Source: support.flir.com
Link:https://support.flir.com/docdownload/assets/web/42vu/en-us/
41.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: 07 infraredwaves
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/ems/07_infraredwaves/
42.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/988673/dvpcc/false/
43.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1014100/dvpcc/false/
44.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1010272/dvpcc/false/
45.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1014102/dvpcc/false/
46.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006062/dvpcc/false/
47.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006060/dvpcc/false/
48.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1010263/dvpcc/false/
49.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: taking earths temperature from a tiny satellite
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/science-research/science-enabling-technology/technology-highlights/taking-earths-temperature-from-a-tiny-satellite/
50.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006097/dvpcc/false/
51.
Source: support.flir.com
Link:https://support.flir.com/docdownload/assets/web/27eh/en-us/
52.
Source: flir.com
Title: Use Low-Cost Materials to Increase Target Emissivity | Flir
Link:https://www.flir.com/en-gb/discover/rd-science/use-low-cost-materials-to-increase-target-emissivity/
53.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: landsat ghostbusters how the landsat calibration team caught a ghost
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/missions/landsat/landsat-ghostbusters-how-the-landsat-calibration-team-caught-a-ghost/
54.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: spacecraft maps earths global emissivity
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/photojournal/nasa-spacecraft-maps-earths-global-emissivity/
55.
Source: nasa.gov
Title: NIS T in Space: Better Remote Sensors for Better Science
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/stmd/niac/niac-studies/nist-in-space-better-remote-sensors-for-better-science/
56.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: landsat 8 images earths biggest satellitecheck it out
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/missions/landsat/landsat-8-images-earths-biggest-satellitecheck-it-out/
57.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/ftag/MSF0951a18/
58.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: UAP Imagery UAP Video
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Inactive-Parent/Next-UAP-Imagery-dup/
59.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: AAR O UAP Trends All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office UAP REPORTING TRENDS
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/UAP-Reporting-Trends/
60.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: AAR O UAP Trends All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office UAP REPORTING TRENDS
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/UAP-Reporting-Trends/quot/
61.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-Trends/
62.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Bruce-working/Next-AARO-UAP-Trends-Charts/
63.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/
64.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: Congressional Press Products
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Congressional-Press-Products/
65.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-Congressional-Press-Products/
66.
Source: asapdata.arc.nasa.gov
Link:https://asapdata.arc.nasa.gov/emas/reference/guide.html
67.
Source: science.gsfc.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.gsfc.nasa.gov/earth/biosphere/researchareas/131/
68.
Source: support.flir.com
Link:https://support.flir.com/docdownload/assets/web/vj2p/en-us/T506145.xml.html
69.
Source: docs.flir.com
Link:https://docs.flir.com/T810413/en-US/latest/s13.html
70.
Source: flir.com
Link:https://www.flir.com/en-gb/products/tg298/
71.
Source: flir.com
Link:https://www.flir.com/en-gb/products/e6-pro/?segment=solutions&vertical=condition+monitoring
72.
Source: support.flir.com
Link:https://support.flir.com/docdownload/assets/web/99yx/en-us/sect1sect7.html
73.
Source: support.flir.com
Link:https://support.flir.com/docdownload/assets/web/qj4c/en-us/T506394.xml.html
74.
Source: flir.com
Link:https://www.flir.com/en-eu/products/t600bx/
75.
Source: flir.com
Link:https://www.flir.com/en-gb/products/tg298/?segment=solutions&vertical=condition+monitoring
76.
Source: fluke.com
Link:https://www.fluke.com/en-us/learn/blog/thermal-imaging/fixing-thermography-reflectivity
77.
Source: dvidshub.net
Link:https://www.dvidshub.net/video/977839/pr-008-unresolved-uap-report-europe-2022
Source snippet
Video - PR-008, Unresolved UAP Report, Europe 2022January 1, 2022...
Published: January 1, 2022
78.
Source: uap-blog.com
Link:https://www.uap-blog.com/aaro-5-nouvelles-videos-uap/
79.
Source: poli-plast.ua
Title: P R-008
Link:https://poli-plast.ua/products/ptssh-008-3/
Additional References
80.
Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4168422/
Source snippet
PubMed Central (PMC)Infrared Thermography for Temperature Measurement and Non-Destructive Testing - PMC...
81.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050923010931
Source snippet
Suppressing reflected radiation to enhance infrared thermography inspection - ScienceDirect...
82.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHM4ngWefRM
Source snippet
US Military REVEALS What Was Actually Behind 2023 Infrared Video Allegedly Showing UAP...
Published: October 2023
83.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycI2O7Fh0qw
Source snippet
UAP FILES - Visual Evidence from 3 Cases over Africa (2022-2024)...
84.
Source: nist.gov
Link:https://www.nist.gov/publications/best-practice-guidelines-pre-launch-characterization-and-calibration-instruments
85.
Source: nist.gov
Link:https://www.nist.gov/publications/nist-txr-calibration-goesr-external-calibration-target-ect-goesr-advanced-baseline
86.
Source: nist.gov
Link:https://www.nist.gov/publications/effects-emissitivity-and-camera-point-spread-function-temperature-measurement-segmented
87.
Source: nist.gov
Link:https://www.nist.gov/publications/validation-infrared-emissivity-characterization-materials-through-intercomparison
88.
Source: acquisition.gov
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/far-overhaul/you-said-we-did
89.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UAP FILES
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhP8VdCIz9A
Source snippet
[PR-018]({{ 'pr-018/' | relative_url }}): Footage of Unresolved UAP over Europe in 2024...