Within Secret Aircraft
When Blue Book Knew More Than It Could Say
Investigators could sometimes link sightings to secret U-2 flights but could not reveal that answer without exposing a classified programme.
On this page
- How UFO reports were checked against U 2 operations
- Why investigators could not disclose the real aircraft
- How misleading explanations damaged public trust
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Project Blue Book’s encounters with the secret U-2 reconnaissance aircraft expose a particularly revealing problem in the history of UFO investigation: investigators could sometimes know, or have strong classified grounds to believe, what a witness had seen while being forbidden to disclose that answer. The CIA’s own historical accounts state that Blue Book personnel checked UFO reports against U-2 flight logs and could thereby attribute many sightings to the aircraft. Yet protecting the U-2 programme meant that they could not tell witnesses that a secret American aeroplane was responsible. Instead, some sightings were publicly associated with natural phenomena such as ice crystals or temperature inversions.[CIA]cia.govDOC 0005517742A Die-Hard IssueCIA’s Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947-90Gerald K. HainesAn extraordinary 95 percent of allMarch 25, 2026…
That distinction matters. Secrecy did not merely leave some cases unexplained; according to the CIA history, it sometimes caused the government to issue explanations that concealed what investigators privately believed. The immediate purpose was protecting an exceptionally sensitive reconnaissance capability. The longer-term consequence was an evidential mismatch between classified knowledge and the public Blue Book record — exactly the sort of mismatch that later encouraged suspicions of a government UFO cover-up.[CIA]cia.govthe cias role in the study of ufosthe cias role in the study of ufos
How Blue Book could privately identify a U-2
The U-2 created an unusual identification problem because its performance lay outside what civilian observers reasonably expected an aeroplane to be capable of doing in the mid-1950s. The CIA’s official history by Gregory Pedlow and Donald Welzenbach says commercial airliners generally operated between about 10,000 and 20,000 feet, while military aircraft such as B-47s and B-57s normally remained below 40,000 feet. The U-2, by contrast, was flying above 60,000 feet. Its very altitude therefore undermined an otherwise obvious identification: observers had little reason to assume that an apparent object so high above conventional traffic was another manned aircraft.[National Archives]archives.govOpen source on archives.gov.
Lighting made the effect more striking. Early U-2s had reflective silver surfaces. The CIA history describes a characteristic early-evening geometry in which an airliner at roughly 20,000 feet had already passed into darkness while a U-2 tens of thousands of feet above it remained illuminated by the Sun. Its wings could reflect sunlight towards the lower aircraft and appear as a bright or fiery object. Daylight glints could also be visible from lower altitudes or from the ground.[Naval History and Heritage Command]history.navy.milmil U-2s, UFOs, and Operation Blue Bookmil U-2s, UFOs, and Operation Blue Book
This was therefore not simply a matter of careless observers failing to recognise an ordinary aeroplane. A commercial pilot might correctly recognise that the object seemed to occupy an altitude where, according to publicly understood aviation capabilities, manned aircraft were not expected. The crucial information required for identification — that the United States possessed an aeroplane capable of operating above 60,000 feet — was itself secret.
Blue Book, however, occupied a different informational position. Its investigators could draw on channels unavailable to witnesses. Pedlow and Welzenbach’s CIA history states that Blue Book personnel regularly contacted the CIA’s U-2 project staff in Washington and asked them to compare reported UFO sightings with U-2 flight logs. This created a classified cross-check: reported location and timing could be compared with the movements of an aircraft whose existence and operations could not be discussed openly.[Naval History and Heritage Command]history.navy.milmil U-2s, UFOs, and Operation Blue Bookmil U-2s, UFOs, and Operation Blue Book
CIA historian Gerald K. Haines independently described essentially the same arrangement. In his history of the Agency’s involvement with UFOs, he wrote that Blue Book investigators who knew about the secret flights checked with the U-2 Project Staff and were able to attribute many UFO sightings to U-2 operations. The two CIA histories therefore establish the core mechanism particularly strongly: Blue Book’s public UFO investigation had access, at least in some cases, to a classified verification channel that the witness and the wider public did not have.[CIA]cia.govthe cias role in the study of ufosthe cias role in the study of ufos
Why the correct answer could not become the public answer
Identifying the U-2 publicly would have defeated part of the purpose of keeping the aircraft classified. Developed by the CIA and Lockheed as a high-altitude reconnaissance platform, the aircraft was intended to gather intelligence on strategically important targets, particularly in the Soviet bloc. Revealing that the United States possessed an aeroplane operating at such extraordinary altitudes would have disclosed a significant intelligence capability.[National Archives]archives.govOpen source on archives.gov.
The secrecy problem therefore extended beyond the aircraft’s name. A candid explanation of a particular UFO sighting might also have confirmed that a U-2 had been flying in a particular place at a particular time. Repeated disclosures could potentially reveal operating areas and patterns as well as technical capabilities. From the perspective of the reconnaissance programme, satisfying public curiosity about UFO reports ranked far below protecting intelligence collection.
Blue Book nevertheless had a public investigative function. Its files accumulated reports from military personnel, pilots and civilians, and the Air Force was expected to classify sightings as identified, insufficient data or unidentified. The National Archives records that Blue Book and its predecessor investigations ultimately accumulated 12,618 reports, of which 701 remained classified as unidentified when the programme ended in 1969.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
That created an institutional contradiction. Blue Book was supposed to explain reports, but in a U-2-related case the most accurate explanation could itself be classified. Simply publishing “U-2 reconnaissance aircraft” was not an option. Nor could the Air Force necessarily show the witness the flight record that supported that identification.
The government’s response went beyond silence. Haines states that investigators aware of U-2 operations tried to explain sightings through phenomena such as ice crystals and temperature inversions while keeping the actual aircraft secret. His account says they were deliberately careful not to reveal the true cause to the public.[CIA]cia.govDOC 0005517742A Die-Hard IssueCIA’s Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947-90Gerald K. HainesAn extraordinary 95 percent of allMarch 25, 2026…
That is the central distortion created by secrecy. There are three very different outcomes an investigation can produce:
- Unexplained: investigators do not have enough evidence to determine what was observed.
- Identified but undisclosed: investigators possess evidence pointing to the answer but cannot reveal it.
- Identified but publicly misdescribed: investigators possess a classified explanation and substitute a different public explanation to protect it.
The CIA history indicates that U-2-related Blue Book cases could fall into the latter two categories. Consequently, a weak public explanation did not necessarily represent the full state of government knowledge.
The public record could look less convincing than the classified investigation
This arrangement created a problem that became more important with time. A person reading a Blue Book file could judge the Air Force’s stated explanation against the evidence preserved in that public record. If the file attributed an unusual light to atmospheric effects but omitted the classified flight information that actually explained why investigators regarded the case as solved, the official conclusion could appear arbitrary or evasive.
That appearance mattered because Blue Book was not merely an internal intelligence exercise. It was the publicly visible Air Force programme associated with UFO investigation. The National Archives’ surviving documentation shows the breadth of the enterprise, including sighting reports, correspondence, questionnaires and analytical material. Its official conclusions were also categorical: the Air Force said the investigation had found no UFO that threatened national security, no evidence that unidentified reports represented technology beyond contemporary scientific knowledge, and no evidence that they were extraterrestrial vehicles.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
U-2 secrecy does not by itself invalidate those conclusions. It demonstrates something narrower but historically important: the public-facing evidence supporting particular Blue Book explanations could be incomplete by design.
The difference becomes especially important when evaluating witnesses. Suppose an airline pilot reported an extraordinarily high bright object and rejected an explanation involving ice crystals because its apparent behaviour seemed more like a distant aircraft. If investigators privately knew that a U-2 had actually been operating in the relevant area, the pilot’s observational account might have been substantially accurate even though the identification was wrong. The witness was missing classified context, not necessarily misperceiving the basic phenomenon.
This is one reason the U-2 episode is unusually valuable in the study of historical UFO reports. It supplies a documented mechanism by which an honest witness, a conventional human object and a misleading official explanation could coexist in the same case.
The disputed claim that spy aircraft caused more than half of reports
A much larger numerical claim is often attached to this history and needs to be treated more cautiously. Pedlow and Welzenbach’s CIA history states that U-2 and later OXCART flights accounted for more than half of UFO reports during the late 1950s and much of the 1960s. Haines likewise wrote that later estimates from officials associated with the U-2 and OXCART programmes put manned reconnaissance flights at more than half of reports over this period.[Naval History and Heritage Command]history.navy.milmil U-2s, UFOs, and Operation Blue Bookmil U-2s, UFOs, and Operation Blue Book
The Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) repeated this assessment in its 2024 historical review. Discussing Project AQUATONE, AARO stated that more than half of UFO reports investigated during the 1950s and 1960s had been assessed as US reconnaissance flights and repeated the observation that reports increased when U-2s were operating.[AARO]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil.
The claim should nevertheless be distinguished from the much better documented proposition that some UFO reports were matched to U-2 flights. The published CIA histories provide a clear description of the checking procedure and the concealment policy, but they do not provide a public case-by-case catalogue demonstrating that more than half of all relevant reports correspond to individual reconnaissance sorties. Haines himself describes the figure as deriving from later estimates by officials connected with the programmes.[CIA]cia.govDOC 0005517742A Die-Hard IssueCIA’s Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947-90Gerald K. HainesAn extraordinary 95 percent of allMarch 25, 2026…
Critics of the statistic have therefore questioned whether the surviving Blue Book numbers and known flight histories can support such a sweeping percentage. The criticism does not erase the primary-source CIA testimony that U-2 matches occurred; rather, it challenges how far that mechanism can be extrapolated across the entire UFO-report population. This distinction is especially important because the “more than half” figure has subsequently been repeated in popular histories and official summaries, giving an estimate a greater appearance of statistical precision than its publicly demonstrated evidential basis warrants.[WIRED]wired.comOpen source on wired.com.
For the narrower question of Blue Book secrecy, the disputed percentage is not essential. Even if the true proportion were considerably lower, the governance problem remains: investigators were sometimes given access to the information needed to solve a report while simultaneously being prevented from disclosing that solution.
Secrecy protected the aircraft but weakened trust in Blue Book
In immediate national-security terms, the policy had an intelligible logic. The U-2 was an extraordinarily sensitive reconnaissance programme operating during a period of intense strategic competition with the Soviet Union. Revealing its performance or operations simply to correct public UFO speculation would have imposed a potentially serious intelligence cost.
But the policy transferred that cost into another domain: institutional credibility.
Haines explicitly recognised this consequence. His CIA history says the Air Force made misleading and deceptive public statements to protect the sensitive reconnaissance programme and argued that the deception later contributed to conspiracy theories and controversy about a UFO cover-up.[CIA]cia.govDOC 0005517742A Die-Hard IssueCIA’s Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947-90Gerald K. HainesAn extraordinary 95 percent of allMarch 25, 2026…
That consequence follows from a basic problem of trust. When authorities tell the public that a puzzling sighting has a mundane explanation, their credibility depends partly on the assumption that the explanation represents their best assessment. Once declassification reveals that officials sometimes possessed a different, stronger explanation that they deliberately withheld, later audiences have a rational historical reason to ask whether other official explanations were similarly constrained.
This does not establish that every disputed Blue Book explanation concealed a secret aircraft, much less that the government was hiding extraterrestrial technology. It establishes a narrower and more defensible proposition: at least one major classified aviation programme created circumstances in which truthful public UFO explanations conflicted with national-security requirements, and secrecy sometimes won.
The distinction is crucial because it explains how genuine government concealment can become attached to much broader claims for which there is no comparable evidence. The documented secret was a reconnaissance aircraft. But once witnesses learned that officials really had concealed conventional aircraft behind misleading explanations, suspicion could easily expand beyond the cases that secrecy actually explained.
What the U-2 episode reveals about Blue Book
Project Blue Book’s U-2 problem ultimately was not just a problem of aircraft recognition. It was a problem of information governance.
A witness might have enough information to know that an observation was extraordinary relative to familiar aviation but not enough to identify a classified aeroplane. Blue Book might have enough information to identify that aeroplane but not the authority to disclose it. The public might then receive an explanation stripped of the decisive evidence or, according to the CIA histories, an alternative explanation deliberately intended to conceal the classified cause.[Naval History and Heritage Command]history.navy.milmil U-2s, UFOs, and Operation Blue Bookmil U-2s, UFOs, and Operation Blue Book
That produces a useful hierarchy when reading historical UFO files. The observation itself, the investigator’s internal assessment and the government’s public statement should not automatically be treated as identical records of knowledge. U-2 secrecy demonstrates that they could diverge substantially.
Declassification has made that divergence visible. The National Archives now provides access to the declassified Blue Book collection, while declassified CIA histories describe how U-2 sightings interacted with the programme. Pedlow and Welzenbach’s internal history gives the operational mechanism — unusual high-altitude appearances, reports from pilots and ground observers, and checks against U-2 flight logs — while Haines’s later institutional history makes the policy consequence explicit: officials concealed the true cause and sometimes offered misleading explanations.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024…
The strongest conclusion is therefore more precise than the claim that “UFOs were really spy planes”. Some historical UFO reports were generated by secret reconnaissance aircraft, but the distinctive Blue Book issue was what happened after investigators recognised that possibility. Classification prevented the strongest evidence from entering the public explanation. In some cases, secrecy apparently replaced a correct classified answer with a less accurate public one.
That policy protected the U-2 when secrecy had genuine strategic value. It also left a durable historical cost. Once the underlying programme was declassified, people could see that government investigators had sometimes known more than they had said. Blue Book’s U-2 experience thus illustrates one of the most important mechanisms behind Cold War UFO controversy: a conventional object could produce a sincere unidentified sighting, classified intelligence could privately resolve it, and the need to protect that intelligence could ensure that the correct explanation remained publicly unavailable for years.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to When Blue Book Knew More Than It Could Say. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
The author belives that a number of UFO siting are still to be explained.
50 Years of the U-2: The Complete Illustrated History of the...
When the U-2 first took off in 1955, no one involved in its top-secret project dreamt that this unique reconnaissance aircraft would stil...
Skunk Works: A Personal Memoir of My Years at Lockheed
The former head of Lockheed's SKUNK WORKS reveals the amazing story of the secret aircraft that changed the course of history - from the...
Forbidden Science: Journals,
Known principally as an investigator of the UFO phenomenon and a science fiction novelist, the French-born Vallee (now a resident of the...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromU-2 aircraft patch oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: cia.gov
Title: DOC 0005517742
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0005517742.pdf
Source snippet
A Die-Hard IssueCIA’s Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947-90Gerald K. HainesAn extraordinary 95 percent of allMarch 25, 2026...
Published: March 25, 2026
2.
Source: cia.gov
Title: the cia and the u 2 program 1954 1974
Link:https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/books-monographs/the-cia-and-the-u-2-program-1954-1974/
Source snippet
The CIA and the U-2 Program, 1954-1974 - CSI...
3.
Source: cia.gov
Title: cias role in the study of ufos 1947 1990
Link:https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/studies-in-intelligence/studies-in-intelligence-1997/cias-role-in-the-study-of-ufos-1947-1990/
Source snippet
CIA's Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947-1990 - CSI...
4.
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos
Source snippet
National ArchivesProject BLUE BOOK - Unidentified Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024...
Published: June 25, 2024
5.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/project-blue-book-50th-anniversary
6.
Source: history.com
Title: How the CIA Tried to Quell UFO Panic During the Cold War | HISTORY
Link:https://www.history.com/articles/ufo-sightings-cia-robertson-condon
7.
Source: prologue.blogs.archives.gov
Title: Pieces of History UFOs: Natural Explanations – Pieces of History
Link:https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2018/04/16/ufos-natural-explanations/
8.
Source: prologue.blogs.archives.gov
Title: Pieces of History UFOs: Man-Made, Made Up, and Unknown – Pieces of History
Link:https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2018/04/23/ufos-man-made-made-up-and-unknown/
9.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-UAP-Report-Documents/poster/dividLink/
10.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-Imagery-Acc-Table/
11.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/
12.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Air Force Records | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force
13.
Source: prologue.blogs.archives.gov
Title: saucers over washington the history of project blue book
Link:https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2019/12/19/saucers-over-washington-the-history-of-project-blue-book/
14.
Source: visit.archives.gov
Title: gov50 Years Ago: Government Stops Investigating UFOs | National Archives Museum
Link:https://visit.archives.gov/whats-on/explore-exhibits/50-years-ago-government-stops-investigating-ufos
15.
Source: history.com
Title: ufo chiles whitted soviet spycraft air force coverup
Link:https://www.history.com/articles/ufo-chiles-whitted-soviet-spycraft-air-force-coverup
16.
Source: prologue.blogs.archives.gov
Title: invasion of privacy
Link:https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2018/04/09/invasion-of-privacy/
17.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Do Records Show Proof of UFOs? | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/do-records-show-proof-of-ufos
18.
Source: unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov
Title: aliens at the archives
Link:https://unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov/2017/04/26/aliens-at-the-archives/
19.
Source: cia.gov
Title: How To Investigate a Flying Saucer
Link:https://www.cia.gov/stories/story/how-to-investigate-a-flying-saucer/
20.
Source: history.com
Title: u s air force closes the book on ufos 45 years ago
Link:https://www.history.com/articles/u-s-air-force-closes-the-book-on-ufos-45-years-ago
21.
Source: declassification.blogs.archives.gov
Title: what on earth is it
Link:https://declassification.blogs.archives.gov/2014/03/28/what-on-earth-is-it/
22.
Source: unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov
Title: project blue book looking to the film record
Link:https://unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov/2013/09/30/project-blue-book-looking-to-the-film-record/
23.
Source: history.com
Title: Project Blue Book
Link:https://www.history.com/articles/project-blue-book
24.
Source: history.com
Title: of UFOs
Link:https://www.history.com/articles/history-of-ufos
25.
Source: cia.gov
Title: The U-2 Program: The DCI’s Perspective
Link:https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/studies-in-intelligence/archives/vol-42-no-5/the-u-2-program-the-dcis-perspective/
26.
Source: cia.gov
Title: the cias role in the study of ufos 1947 90
Link:https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/studies-in-intelligence/archives/vol-40-no-5/the-cias-role-in-the-study-of-ufos-1947-90/
27.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Records/-1/
28.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-Submit-a-Report-dup/
29.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Inactive-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-DT-Records/
30.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: Congressional Tab DT
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/AARO-Congressional-Tab-DT/
31.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Bruce-working/Next-AARO-UAP-Trends-Charts/
32.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Inactive-Parent/Next-Congressional-Press-Products/
33.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: Congressional Press Products
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Congressional-Press-Products/
34.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Resources/Historical-Record-Reports/Volume-II/
35.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-Trends/
36.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Project Blue Book
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjinS2lZAsY
Source snippet
Top 10 Declassified UAP Secrets...
37.
Source: en.ikwipedia.org
Title: Project Blue Book
Link:https://en.ikwipedia.org/wiki/Project_Blue_Book
38.
Source: history.navy.mil
Title: mil U-2s, UFOs, and Operation Blue Book
Link:https://www.history.navy.mil/research/library/online-reading-room/title-list-alphabetically/u/u2s-ufos-and-operation-blue-book.html
39.
Source: theblackvault.com
Title: cias role in the study of ufos 1947 90
Link:https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/cias-role-in-the-study-of-ufos-1947-90/
40.
Source: military-history.fandom.com
Title: Project Blue Book
Link:https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Project_Blue_Book
41.
Source: wikizero.net
Title: Project Blue Book
Link:https://www.wikizero.net/wiki/en/Project_Blue_Book
42.
Source: internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com
Title: Project Blue Book
Link:https://www.internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com/project-blue-book/
43.
Source: internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com
Title: cias role in the study of ufos 1947 90
Link:https://www.internationalflyingsaucerbureau.com/cias-role-in-the-study-of-ufos-1947-90/
Additional References
44.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOB/comments/1brrnv4
Source snippet
Metabunk looks at the claim "half of UFOs in the 50s and 60s were manned reconnaissance flights." This claim made it into the recen...
45.
Source: en.wikisource.org
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Report_on_the_Historical_Record_of_U.S._Government_Involvement_with_Unidentified_Anomalous_Phenomena/Volume_1/Section_8
Source snippet
Report on the Historical Record of U.S. Government Involvement with Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena/Volume 1/Section 8 - Wikis...
46.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1rer5ni/the_cias_claim_that_half_of_ufos_in_the_50s_and/
Source snippet
The CIA's claim that "half of UFOs" in the 50s and 60s were secret aircraft has already long been debunked by researchers on both s...
47.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Inside the Declassified UFO Files: The CIA’s Secret UFO Archive
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPbg1YrmfY8
Source snippet
Project Blue Book U-2 CIA UFO secrecy Astronomer, J Allen Hynek, Gives his Thoughts on Project Blue Book...
48.
Source: nro.gov
Link:https://www.nro.gov/About-NRO/history/index.html
49.
Source: nro.gov
Link:https://www.nro.gov/news-media-featured-stories/nro-multimedia/nro-seal/
50.
Source: nsa.gov
Link:https://www.nsa.gov/Helpful-Links/NSA-FOIA/Declassification-Transparency-Initiatives/FOIA-Reports-and-Releases/FOIA-Reports-and-Releases-List/igtag/3177591/
51.
Source: nsa.gov
Link:https://www.nsa.gov/Helpful-Links/NSA-FOIA/Declassification-Transparency-Initiatives/FOIA-Reports-and-Releases/FOIA-Reports-and-Releases-List/igtag/6652457/
52.
Source: nsa.gov
Link:https://www.nsa.gov/Helpful-Links/NSA-FOIA/Declassification-Transparency-Initiatives/FOIA-Reports-and-Releases/
53.
Source: nsa.gov
Link:https://www.nsa.gov/Helpful-Links/NSA-FOIA/Declassification-Transparency-Initiatives/FOIA-Reports-and-Releases/FOIA-Reports-and-Releases-List/